Tucker Carlson Interviews Vladimir Putin

[guest587]

"30 Years of Russia Seeking Peace with the West"
https://rumble.com/v4chtez-30-years-of-russia-seeking-peace-with-the-west.html

The interview in full,
https://tuckercarlson.com/the-vladimir-putin-interview/

Vladimir Putin says he did not start the current conflict but is putting an end to it- which is why he gives 1,000 years worth of history leading up to this point.

[guest587]

During his interview with Tucker Carlson, Russian President Vladimir Putin confirmed that then British Prime Minister Boris Johnson sabotaged a peace deal with Ukraine that would have ended the war 18 months ago.
https://modernity.news/2024/02/09/putin-confirms-boris-johnson-sabotaged-peace-deal-with-ukraine/

[Jitendra Hydonus]

30 years of invasion and destroying Democracy

Steve,

Most people on the planet are sold, lock stock and barrel on the reality of their lives and this planet we inhabit. But a growing number among us have seen holes in the fabric of this creation and are becoming more and more convinced we are inhabitants of a surreal existence here on this planet, with alternate realities in our midst.

My frustration is with my self. Because we hit a dead end and I begin to feel like I'm wasting my energy. I have no real interest in engaging you in the manner you wish at this time. I believe you put your Faith in sources that have manipulated the public. You can believe otherwise. You can think the same about me. But I am going to post what I want and not feel bad about it. I'm not being disrespectful to you- just, I am not always interested in your logic. In this way, there's nothing to "hash out." Instead, I will post something that I think is quite relative, a greater picture I'm starting to see-

This thread started with your opinion about Tucker Carlson- and it is quite a polarizing one at that. Your bias became more apparent as you started showing opinion pieces written in ways that are designed to subtly manipulate public opinion. With regards to social media, we call this effect an "echo-chamber." I see it on both sides, left and right. I too, post polarizing content. But are we accurately discerning the intentions of the curators of said content? Depending on the leanings of a platform, you will find a particular view point echoed through others. And unfortunately, information is indeed weaponized. This is a very human characteristic. One ruled by Ego and motivated by Greed or Control. But we recognize an even greater capacity for Soul and Love, don't we?

"Lets look within and see how that is being projected out onto the world. How much of what we think is not real, is real? We're like a machine that continually projects out onto the world a web of assumptions that then gets adjusted by whatever structure someone else perceives or we perceive- and then we internalize that and we think its reality. By default, whatever version of reality we think is real- is extremely limited to our senses."
https://twitter.com/RealAlexJones/status/1756060994994893102

This is a fantastic interview ^^^ that is by far more interesting to me than your thoughts on Putin(at this time). And I put it here because I find relevance. You are free to ignore this reply, and you are free to continue in your polarity. I recognize the frustrations shared by other members... That frustration is ultimately with ourselves, we can disagree with others, but I wonder if we are really seeing the other- or if we're just seeing some disagreeable aspect of ourself with which we aren't quite ready to face? Our interest would have us elsewhere, so it seems we are all slightly polarized by the lens of our personality.

Maybe you are helping me liberate my self from duality. Separately... By your own admission, you don't mind using derogatory language. Don't be surprised if you find it reflected back to you from time to time. The problem is, you don't even consider the way you share your opinions derogatory. You can see it in me, but can you see it in you or the op-eds you share?

Hmm...
What is reality? That's where my energy is at this moment. That is not meant to belittle your intuition or the focus of your intent. No doubt what you see is important, and for a reason.

....Yes, I am often finding a mirror between us- even if we aren't experiencing the landscape in the same manner. 

If you have no interest in engaging me in a discussion, why do you present material to look at in a video for us to discuss? Am I missing the whole point here Eric? When someone responds and interjects a point of view, is this site not open for discussion? Who’s ‘hashing out’ what? I thought you were interested in this interview with Tucker Carlson. If not, why did you post it?

As I have told you the sources that you feel are manipulating the public are the sources you have given me. That is where I have developed  my responses from. Have u felt bad about what you have posted? I have no control over how you feel about your posts dear friend. I am not saying you need to have an interest in my logic. But you have presented your logic via a video presentation. If it is not your logic then please explain. I am responding to the video presented. If  indeed i am presenting my opinion in ways that are subtly attempting to manipulate public opinion is that such a bad expression? I mean isn’t everyone that has ideas persuading others in their preferred path to have a certain outcome in the world of political and social pressures? You are essentially saying to me you have your view and I have mine and you see no reason to discuss our differences but see all the reason to discuss those things we share in common, that is my view of the statements you just made above. There is nothing essentially wrong with  that but we are on a public platform Eric. This is not just a matter of you and I, it is a whole political agenda that is influencing culture. It is a matter of how people are treating each other. It is a matter of how I’ve been treated as well because of MAGA views. It is not possible to separate people from their views and how they are implemented. These views that Putin has have been implemented in very inhuman ways. For instance; I can go down the street and break windows and barricades and climb on areas designated as public domain to break into public offices and claim that the other guys let me do it. But at some point I have to assess what is right from what is wrong regardless of the people who are unable to do so.

You see my views on Tucker Carlson as polarizing yet you never have felt his views are polarizing? Yes we do recognize an even greater need for love and compassionate understanding. That is why we are usually on the same page in our lives as friends. But don’t friends also disagree on some matters? If you choose not to discuss those disagreements so be it, but up to this point you have responded and I’m merely responding back. I see this as a fundamental problem with the whole MAGA movement and its creator Donal Trump. They really do not want a response back. Donald Trump simply wants ‘yes men’ to bend to his views of reality. That’s why he fired most his staff. Such is the behavioral characteristics of any dictatorial view, and the view of Putin in the interview you presented. Since Tucker Carlson agrees with him he has not asked questions that would be perceived as insulting by Vladimir Putin. Do you not see that he feels he has a no problem torturing, imprisoning, and murdering his opposition because his views are correct and others should acquiesce to them.

On your statement that I see nothing wrong with being derogatory about others; I do not see that….and attempt to be respectful of their views. I have even reshaped some of my expression to reflect that view. However if the views of others are implemented in a way that is consistently contrary to human kindness, like Jesus did with those that were instrumental in crucifying him, I have no problem pointing that out here.

Now you have presented another video above of Alex Jones and Elon Musk.  And another video on Paul Watson in just the last couple of posts. What happened to the two hour video of Tucker Carlson which is the topic of this thread? I do not mind discussions about these other videos either, but can we focus on one video at a time? So far we have not even discussed the video you have presented of Tucker Carlson and Putin. After all that is the focus of this thread; Tucker Carlson. Right?

I do appreciate your inner observations about our chemistry together; both are differences and similarities. And yes I do see a mirror reflected in many of our views and opinions; and both of us are attempting to decipher what is reality.

Eric I share my views here with you not someone else’s that comes from biased backgrounds. I ask you a couple simple questions;

Does Tucker Carlson at any point in this interview address what I consider the most important questions that  Putin should be asked about his invasion of Ukraine and many other nations in his some 30 years as a dictator? That is; will you continue to invade other nations on the pretext that your country is being threatened? And secondly and most importantly; Will you and your government continue to murder, poison, imprison and torture all opposition and censor all those with differing views politicians and journalists, including also those calling your forceful and aggressive invasion of another country anything but a ‘special military operation’ as grounds for treason?

During his interview with Tucker Carlson, Russian President Vladimir Putin confirmed that then British Prime Minister Boris Johnson sabotaged a peace deal with Ukraine that would have ended the war 18 months ago.
https://modernity.news/2024/02/09/putin-confirms-boris-johnson-sabotaged-peace-deal-with-ukraine/

Is Carlson an American 🇺🇸 Journalist or British? Where was he when we needed him??? Certainly he could have reminded Putin that he is an American journalist and asked what we as American citizens had to do with his invasion of a foreign country, and his comments about Boris Johnson? Let the British and Boris Johnson answer for themselves and let us answer for ourselves, which we will be hard pressed to do if we allow Putin and his autocratic regime to destroy democracy in Ukraine’s goals to achieve democracy from despots such as Putin…. And when they have requested our help and support. Carlson as a supportive of the ‘make America great again’ slogan surely could have at least shown that he meant to support America first by asking the simple question; What does America have to do with Boris Johnson accept that he belongs to the same right wing cultists that venerate Donald Trump and MAGA supporters espouse. Although Tucker Carlson’s views may not at this time be aligned with MAGA supporters at least he could show and ask questions that defend our country’s ideals for democracy, and not those views that support totalitarian.

https://www.facebook.com/share/v/ELswRpzLMdxYSwrN/?mibextid=UVffzb

Donald Trumps praise for Boris Johnson;

“Boris is good! He’s going to do a good job! That’s what they wanted That’s what they needed. He will get it done! He’s good. They like me over there!” ~ Donald Trump

[guest587]

This thread was created as an attempt to post the interview without putting my opinion in the matter. See how the title of this thread just states the facts? "Tucker Carlson Interviews Vladimir Putin."

There's nothing more to it than that-

The links I have also provided are points of view from the person being interviewed-

I have removed my personal opinions, and have not read your long winded reply. You have brought over "dirty laundry" so to speak from another thread, hammering out your points- which I have no interest in addressing at this time.

The reason I created a separate thread was because you showed an interest in the interview- that thread was not about the interview but about your opinions of Tucker Carlson(opinions that seem unoriginal and to me, mirror the propaganda being fed to us about him).

To make it easier for you and other members, this thread was created for those who wish to discuss the actual interview and not get lost propaganda or opinion pieces smashing Tucker Carlson.

Because I tend not to care about the energy people create when they share their opinion about politics- I am curious if your reply has anything important to note that what was exchanged between Tucker and Vladimir? That's the hope of this thread- I still need to watch the video in full, then I may come back and address whatever it is you just posted.

Cheers~

[Jitendra Hydonus]

Thanks that is exactly what I did…. Discussed the interview. Can I help it that you do not care to read what I discussed?

This thread was created as an attempt to post the interview without putting my opinion in the matter. See how my title of the thread just states the facts? "Tucker Carlson Interviews Vladimir Putin."

There's nothing more to it than that-

The links I have also provided are points of view from the person being interviewed-

I have removed my opinions on the matter, and have not read your long winded reply. You have brought over the dirty laundry so to speak from another thread, hammering out your points- which I have no interest in addressing at this time.

The reason I created a separate thread was because you showed an interest in the interview- and the thread you posted the interview in was not about the interview itself but about Tucker Carlson and your opinions about him.

To make it easier for you and other members, this thread was created for those who wish to discuss the interview and not get lost in your opinion pieces smashing Tucker Carlson.

Because I tend not to care about peoples opinions on politics or political figures or the energy they bring with it- I am curious if your reply has anything to say about the interview itself? That's the hope of this thread- I still need to watch the video in full, then I may come back and address whatever it is you just posted.

Cheers~

It is your opinion that anyone is ‘smashing Tucker Carlson’ and my ‘discussion’ You have a right to your opinion as I should have also. Don’t you think? It is your point to discuss the interview, not to critique my discussion. Unless Ofcourse you also are amenable to my critique of your discussion?

[guest587]

Steve, you quoted me before I finished replying. I had to go back and edit a few changes. I decided to read your post but I'm not sure I understand, what in the interview did you find most relevant? Do you think you can condense your reply to highlight that without putting your flare on it?

That would be a good way to engage this thread.

For example, can you quote something Vladimir said as it caught your attention?

[Jitendra Hydonus]

Steve, you quoted me before I finished replying. I had to go back and edit a few changes. I decided to read your post but I'm not sure I understand, what in the interview did you find most relevant? Do you think you can condense your reply to highlight that without putting your flare on it?

That would be a good way to engage this thread.

For example, can you quote something Vladimir said as it caught your attention?

That is tantamount to asking Putin to condense his interview friend…. Do you remember how he responded to Tucker when he was was asked such a question? “Are we having a talk show or a serious conversation.” ~Putin.

So ask you the same question. You sent me a two hour interview, I spent a lot of my time listening. Tucker Carlson did not tell Putin his response was ‘ long winded’ as you did mine. But he continued giving us a history lesson.

[guest587]

Well, if you're able to, I'd be curious what you found interesting from the interview. Something he said that you'd like to share and discuss. Thanks.

[Jitendra Hydonus]

Well, if you're able to, I'd be curious what you found interesting from the interview. Something he said that you'd like to share and discuss. Thanks.

I found it more ‘interesting’ 🤔 as to what he did not say because Tucker Carlson did not ask the obvious questions that anyone would want to know from my stand point. That is why he (Putin) has engaged in aggressive and violent actions to other countries and incarcerated all opposition. That is what I’d like to ‘share and discuss.’

[guest587]

Yes, I understood that. But I can't help what he did not say, and I can not answer for Vladimir Putin. Whether you believe what has been presented or not, is one avenue for discussion. Should you find something in this interview that stood out to you- feel free to let me know. That is why I created this thread. Thank you~ 

If it helps, you can start with the first clip I provided(a condensed portion of the interview)- which is only 6 minutes compared to 2 hours.

[Jitendra Hydonus]

Yes, I understood that. But I can't help what he did not say, and I can not answer for Vladimir Putin. Whether you believe what has been presented or not, is one avenue for discussion. Should you find something in this interview that stood out to you- feel free to let me know. That is why I created this thread. Thank you~ 

If it helps, you can start with the first clip I provided(a condensed portion of the interview)- which is only 6 minutes compared to 2 hours.

I will listen to your abridged version as well, but since you sent me the 2 hour version at first let me show you what I have already taken from that and sent to you above and will now send once again…Putin stated that British Prime Minister Boris Johnson was responsible for negotiations breaking down…..

Is Carlson an American 🇺🇸 Journalist or British? Where was he when we needed him??? Certainly he could have reminded Putin that he is an American journalist and asked what we as American citizens had to do with his invasion of a foreign country, and his comments about Boris Johnson? Let the British and Boris Johnson answer for themselves and let us answer for ourselves, which we will be hard pressed to do if we allow Putin and his autocratic regime to destroy democracy in Ukraine’s goals to achieve democracy from despots such as Putin…. And when they have requested our help and support. Carlson as a supportive of the ‘make America great again’ slogan surely could have at least shown that he meant to support America first by asking the simple question; What does America have to do with Boris Johnson accept that he belongs to the same right wing cultists that venerate Donald Trump and MAGA supporters espouse. Although Tucker Carlson’s views may not at this time be aligned with MAGA supporters at least he could show and ask questions that defend our country’s ideals for democracy, and not those views that support totalitarian. I’ve seen Tucker Carlson at his best in other interviews that do show more of an appreciation for everyone’s interests, not just his own.

https://www.facebook.com/share/v/ELswRpzLMdxYSwrN/?mibextid=UVffzb

Donald Trumps praise for Boris Johnson;

“Boris is good! He’s going to do a good job! That’s what they wanted That’s what they needed. He will get it done! He’s good. They like me over there!” ~ Donald Trump

Perhaps you can resend the short version… was it accidentally removed?

[guest587]

Thanks for trying Steve, but I just don't see how what you just posted is relevant to the interview. Maybe I'm confused. Tucker Carlson is an independent journalist. Are you attacking him when you say- Is Carlson an American Journalist or British?

What does that have to do with the interview?

And, you are once again complaining about the questions he didn't ask, how can I help you here? There are plenty of examples of soft ball interviews held even by our own, "American Journalist." So if you're saying you think this is a softball interview.. Okay-

Am I just supposed to say, you're right? What will allow us to move on to the actual information that has been presented?

[Jitendra Hydonus]

Thanks for trying Steve, but I just don't see how what you just posted is relevant to the interview. Maybe I'm confused. Tucker Carlson is an independent journalist. Are you attacking him when you say- Is Carlson an American Journalist or British?

What does that have to do with the interview?

And, you are once again complaining about the questions he didn't ask, how can I help you here? There are plenty of examples of soft ball interviews held even by our own, "American Journalist." So if you're saying you think this is a softball interview.. Okay-

Am I just supposed to say, you're right? What will allow us to move on to the actual information that has been presented?

You have reinforced my statement Eric. If he is an ‘independent’ journalist as you have said above; why hasn’t he asked questions that Americans have continued to ask since Russia invaded Ukraine? The most important ones? I am not here to degrade Tucker Carlson and I do not choose to grade the interview as ‘soft ball’ I mean if you think it over and I was asking the questions where would I be now? Probably in one of Putin’s Gulags. Let me just say this; I really liked the interview that you sent of Tucker Carlson asking questions about the UFO coverups in the United States. I believe his life was not threatened-at least not when he asked questions about UFO coverups-as it would have been if he asked such political questions in Russia.

[guest587]

Steve, you've made your point ad nauseum. I'm sorry I can't provide you much more- but please feel assured your point has been made. When you have something else to offer here, I will decide whether or not it is worth my energy.

[Jitendra Hydonus]

Steve, you've made your point ad nauseum. I'm sorry I can't provide you much more- but please feel assured your point has been made. When you have something else to offer here, I will decide whether or not it is worth my energy.

Yea this (until then) in the event your satisfaction cannot be met on this subject. Decide for yourself… I’ve already decided. But no view is so important that it can’t be challenged. May all your nasal passages be cleared Brother Eric!

Below is an example of what is appreciated….

https://www.bing.com/videos/search?q=tucker+carlson+ufo+coverups+youtube&mid=490866F5AAEF052BCFE7490866F5AAEF052BCFE7&view=detail&FORM=VIRE