Eric you have stated; The Russians also accused the U.S. of “filling Ukraine with biolabs, which were – very possibly – used to study methods for destroying the Russian people at the genetic level.” While this may or may not be true…We also have evidence that Russia has an ongoing bio weapons program. Did Ukrainians invade Russia because of it? No Russia invaded Ukraine. Does a nation have a right to invade another nation because of possibilities? We did that with Iraq. Did that make it right?
https://twitter.com/MeidasTouch/status/1680237265510092800I really see nothing objectionable about what he said here. Bio chemical weapons are part of modern warfare and actions against race where it is possible.
The United States had an offensive biological weapons program from 1943 until 1969. Today, the nation is a member of the Biological Weapons Convention and has renounced biological warfare.
Wikepedia
It is believed that at least six countries could have an ongoing bioweapons program. These include: Iraq, Iran, Libya, China, Russia and North Korea.
What are biological weapons? Here is a list of countries that possess them…
www.wionews.com/science/what-are-biological-weapons-here-is-a-list-of-countries-that-possess-them-330033www.wionews.com/science/what-are-biolEric, our nation has now joined other nations in being against bio chemical warfare. I have yet to see we or Ukraine have used such weapons. But like you we are not privy to every aspect of what our country or any country is making themselves capable of, certainly if any country uses nuclear weapons (which has been threatened by Russia) it is has much worst consequences than any capability to use bio chemicals. As you know Kennedy has exposed the possibility/probability that such weapons were used in the coved 19 epidemic. I find it important to know what is true about such outbreaks.
Commentary by Pir-o-Murshid Inayat Khan:
Every being has an individual ego produced from his own illusion. This limits his view which is led in the direction of his own interest, and he judges of good and bad, high or low, right or wrong in relation to himself and others, through his limited view, which is generally partial and imaginary rather than true. This darkness is caused by the overshadowing of the soul by the external self. Thus a person becomes blind to his own infirmities as well as to the merits of another, and the right action of another becomes wrong in his eyes and the fault of the self seems right. This is the case with mankind in general, until the veil of darkness is lifted from his eyes.
from
https://wahiduddin.net/mv2/II/II_3.htmPresently I do not see any reason to dismantle our differences but still stand by what I consider to be a good balance in our conversations. Perhaps 🤔 you can also help me in determining what would be a good balance that would not interfere with our relationship over the years. Recently I’ve noticed that conversations with some friends became so lopsided away from spiritual conversations that I’ve not been able to talk about topics of a spiritual nature and only those of conversations that involved material concerns. In fact some people would attack my views because they do not correlate with theirs on various topics. I do not at this time see that as a problem between you and I. I’m also ok with spiritual quotes as the one you have provided above, which is certainly a good reminder of the spiritual affects of taking too many different views on any subject, and being able to find a spiritual solution that involves the parties involved in the conversation. It also seems like a great problem with world leaders today. That is they do not have the spiritual capacity to make decisions based on the views of others as well as their own. Nor the spiritual capabilities to solve problems in a spiritual way rather than in a selfish way that only takes into account the views and concerns of their own country. Thus we have slogans like ‘Make America Great Again’, instead of ‘ MOSGA’ (make our spirit great again). If we can have the understanding provided above (by Anayat Khan) I see no reason to take action as I have provided below. I am hopeful that between us we and other long time participants can navigate these challenges without taking the action i once did-again-at this site.
" I want to again remind everyone here that this site was originally created with an interest in meditation and not politics. So if the balance again tilts towards political agendas, I will do one of two things; leave this site and close it down or again delete all the political posts I can find. I am not here to constantly discuss politics; that is not the original purpose of this site."
.
