Spiritual Portal
Mar 03, 2026 12:45 pm
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
News: Steve Hydonus perform this original sing;

https://www.reverbnation.com/stevehydonus
 
  Home Help Gallery Links Staff List Login Register  

Chat GPT controversy

Recent Items

Views: 10
Comments (1)
By: Jitendra Hydonus

Views: 9
Comments (0)
By: Jitendra Hydonus

Views: 5
Comments (0)
By: Jitendra Hydonus

Views: 26
Comments (3)
By: Jitendra Hydonus
Pages: 1 2 [3]
  Print  
Author Topic: Chat GPT controversy  (Read 5741 times)
0 Members and 171 Guests are viewing this topic.
guest587
Guest
« Reply #30 on: Apr 21, 2023 03:43 pm »

It's just untrue but I can see why you think that. I could say your conversations ultimately lead to politics too but I know that you are more than that. I regularly post about Sufism with very little responses in those threads(compared to others). It might be more true you remember and respond to the things you disagree with. I also regularly post about animal totems and things like aura's and out of body experiences- which sometimes get attention.

Not all of my interest will be responded to here. But ultimately I hope as I've just stated with yesterdays post above that we are lead back to remembering the Oneness inherent in all things. If you don't know it, that is where my interest is- more than, "conspiracies."

AI was brought to our attention here by Patrick and the concerns with AI seem to be more of a collective issue than a personal one. I posted the controversy as a way to touch up on the greater concern, and the controversy is factual. ChatGPT is biased in its responses.

I don't know if it's my fault for not making my initial concerns clear enough, or if you just aren't seeing the bigger picture.

But I have indeed posted things that show our news is biased and intentionally misleading its consumers from a larger spiritual truth. EDIT: Usually it is in response to sources provided here that I know to be propaganda or intentionally misleading. Do I accept efforts to mislead or do I respond with what I've seen, the best I can- which is different to your views?

For example... I have friends who support Russia and friends who support Ukraine they are on opposite sides of the narratives- or some that don't buy any of the narratives being fed to us. Same thing with COVID. I have friends who believed the shots safe and effective(a lie) and somehow despite these, "conspiracies and misdirection" I manage to operate between different belief systems. 

Would you be my friend if you were a staunch believer in Jesus Christ, and I have friends who are considered Luciferian? Could you be my friend knowing that? How is it I manage to move past these belief systems and maintain friends from either side of the worlds drama? I ask with sincerity because sometimes "virtual reality" is so attention grabbing, so polarizing, and so often mistaken for "reality" that I don't want to lose sight of what's more important.

PS,

Google and Wikipedia have also shown their biases and even suppressed or altered information and can't be trusted as a reliable entity interested when presenting truth. In a time of crisis, they will present the narrative over the facts. And the concern in this thread is that AI might do the same. They have literally interfered in elections, wrongly labeled scientists, doctors, lawyers, journalist and politicians both during the COVID trials against humanity and the Russia and Ukraine War.

So I wonder how we operate when the world would pull you into its drama and ask you to take a side or try to get you to operate form Hate? Would you be willing to kill me if we were friends and I was a Russian troop? 
Report Spam   Logged

Pages: 1 2 [3]
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by EzPortal
Bookmark this site! | Upgrade This Forum
SMF For Free - Create your own Forum


Powered by SMF | SMF © 2016, Simple Machines
Privacy Policy