That's cool, thanks for humoring me. The thing I understand about RFK Jr is that he is not against vaccines. He was outspoken against the experimental mrna injection which was never a vaccine and our leaders changed the definition of a vaccine so that mrna shot could be called a vaccine. He is basically against rushed sience or science that becomes overtly politicized- science that claims to be the absolute truth or science that stamps out other science carried by the almighty $$$. I'm pretty sure this is how the establishment will try to attack RFK Jr but I am also confident his moral character will outperform the defamation.
RFK JR also wrote a book called, "The Real Anthony Faucci" but I don't expect chat GPT to willingly share that as it did the other books. Which gives pause to how the AI defines people.
He among others(my self included) think mRNA might actually be something of a miracle technology but certainly it is too new to say for sure how safe or effective it is. As it stands we know the harm done is far greater than the good. From forced lock downs, censorship, physical violence, inability to purchase goods, the loss of jobs and small businesses, forced inoculations around the world- and then the physical harm like myocarditis, blood clots and other physical symptoms like neurological disorders, heart attacks and strokes- all downplayed by an authority that desperately tried to convince you the mrna experiment was a safe and effective, "vaccine." We've endured some serious propaganda for all things COVID and I think if Chat GPT were to be available around that time it'd be in favor of the established narrative, defining public figures that speak against it(the narrative) as conspiracy theorist and making sure to include that when defining a person.
I suspect with AI and bias there's a lot of of thought towards semantics that help shape a persons opinion on a subject making for subtle manipulation. Like Andrew Torba for example. It doesn't mention his pro-christian values- instead it chooses to include white nationalism and anti-semitism as a part of his definition. These are accusations a challenged authority has helped create and propagate, while it's correct to say he has denied the allegations- it is also unnecessary to include them as defining who Andrew Torba is because he is not that. Those that attack him wish he were, and I have even seen bad actors on GAB who are eventually rooted out as agents trying to cause harm to the platform. Fake accounts spread bigoted and racist comments and tag Andrew Torba to it. Then the media uses those accounts to define Andrew as a person. It's a nasty thing. It's true there are indeed racist attitudes on GAB, but they are a small minority and having free speech allows the majority to root out dumb, unintelligent or hateful attitudes.
The authority that wants to control every aspect of our lives would have us believe freedom is a child needing adult supervision. Freedom is a fearsome and wise spirit and it is we who must learn to exercise freedom responsibly, or pay the price karmically. There's no escaping nature as the ultimate teacher.
That's my rant.
I think AI is a powerful tool. A friend once called the internet a double edged sword. This seems more of the same.
