Trump takes us for a walk over a cliff

[Jitendra Hydonus]

We have a president who has undeclared war on the ‘enemy within’ with the force of the U.S. military which is unconstitutional and several congress people have the right to defend the constitution and not a man who is increasingly unstable with dementia and irrational and erratic behaviors.

[Jitendra Hydonus]

BREAKING: Trump’s vengeful case against James Comey implodes with a MIND-BLOWING admission from his beauty pageant prosecutor.

The wheels are officially coming off Donald Trump's retribution machine — and this week, his hand-picked prosecutor delivered a meltdown so spectacular it should be taught in law schools under the chapter titled: How To Accidentally Nuke Your Own Case in Under 60 Seconds.

In a courtroom development that observers described as “gobsmacking,” Lindsey Halligan — Trump’s interim U.S. attorney installed to prosecute former FBI Director James Comey — admitted under oath that the grand jury never actually saw the indictment she marched into court and announced to the world.

Let’s pause to absorb that: the centerpiece indictment of Trump’s petty vendetta operation was never voted on by the full grand jury. Not once. Not ever.

This wasn’t a procedural hiccup. This was legal malpractice on the level of accidentally setting your own briefcase on fire in front of the judge — except worse, because it may have just blown up the entire case.

As one legal expert put it bluntly: “There is no indictment.” As another put it even more bluntly: “Unreal incompetence.”

Things only spiraled further for Halligan. Once this revelation hit the room, witnesses say the courtroom fell into absolute silence — the kind of silence that happens when everyone simultaneously realizes the train has gone off the cliff and no one is driving.

The judge was laser-focused on one question: How can a prosecution proceed based on an indictment the grand jury never approved?

And then came the moment that will go down in history — The judge openly wondered aloud whether Halligan was “a puppet” — a stalking horse for Donald Trump sent to carry out his personal revenge crusade.
When a federal judge asks if the prosecutor is someone’s puppet, the case isn’t just in trouble — it’s already on fire and sinking beneath the waves.

But the revelations kept coming. The grand jury had actually rejected the original charges against Comey — voted them down. Hard no. And instead of going back to the drawing board, the Trump-installed team simply made up a new indictment. In secret. Without the grand jury. Without approval. Without legality. And then presented it as if everything were normal.

Even the transcript of the grand jury proceeding is missing chunks — including in the judge’s own copy. When questioned, Halligan got visibly irritated, snippy, and evasive, because of course she did — her entire operation was unraveling right in front of everyone.

This isn’t just a faceplant. It’s the collapse of the central pillar of Trump’s ongoing attempt to punish his enemies through the Justice Department. His own prosecutor admitted the case is essentially built on vapor, wishful thinking, and blind loyalty to a man who has turned incompetence into a governing philosophy.

So now we have a judge questioning whether the prosecutor is Trump's puppet, a grand jury that never approved the indictment, missing transcripts, and a legal strategy that amounts to “Hope nobody notices.”

Spoiler alert — they noticed.

And the result is the same story we’ve seen again and again — every time Donald Trump tries to weaponize the system against his critics, it’s his own people who end up blowing themselves up.

This time, they brought down their biggest revenge case yet.

Please like and share if you think that the Trump administration is the most deceitful and incompetent in history!

[Jitendra Hydonus]

DOGE is dead, and the truth is finally out: it didn’t save money — it burned it. Analysts estimate DOGE’s chaos has COST taxpayers around $135 billion, from mass firings to lost tax revenue.

$135 BILLION.

That’s not a typo. That’s a real estimate from the nonpartisan Partnership for Public Service, and it comes straight from the chaos Elon Musk and Donald Trump unleashed across the federal workforce. Those firings, forced resignations, and sloppy “restructuring” efforts? They’re expensive. Really expensive. And guess who pays? Not Musk. Not Trump. You.

DOGE promised to cut $2 trillion in waste. Then Musk lowered it to $150 billion. Now? Independent analyses say even that smaller number was wildly inflated — by as much as 80%. DOGE bragged about canceling “multi-billion-dollar” contracts that turned out to be worth… millions. In some cases, contracts had already expired, and DOGE tried to count them as “savings” anyway.

Meanwhile, the federal government is bleeding talent. More than 260,000 federal employees have been pushed out — fired, bought out, or forced into early retirement. Reuters documented that. Entire agencies are hollowed out. And the IRS might lose a full one-third of its workforce.

Why does that matter? Because when you fire the people who collect taxes, the government collects less money. A Yale Budget Lab report found that if 22,000 IRS workers leave, the agency will lose $8.5 billion in revenue in 2026 alone — and nearly $198 billion over ten years. All because there aren’t enough people left to conduct audits or chase down wealthy tax cheats.

So DOGE isn’t saving money.
 It’s losing money.
 And not quietly.

The “efficiency” Musk promised has instead created a bureaucratic demolition derby. Productivity has cratered. Agencies can’t function. Workers spend hours each week responding to Musk’s emails demanding lists of their “five accomplishments,” costing an estimated 165,000 hours of lost time. That’s not efficiency — that’s ego.

And here’s the punchline: After just ten months, DOGE has now been quietly dissolved.

 Its own numbers never added up. Its projects collapsed. The workforce cuts caused more financial harm than good. Even experts who believe in cutting government waste say DOGE did the exact opposite — slashing randomly, creating confusion, and leaving taxpayers “holding the bag” while Musk strolls back to his private ventures.

This is the future Trump and Musk are selling: a government so gutted it can’t serve the public, collect taxes, or even function — but still somehow costs more.

They promised a revolution in efficiency.
 They gave us a massively expensive mess.

And the American people are the ones stuck paying the bill.

[Jitendra Hydonus]

View this post on Instagram

[Jitendra Hydonus]

View this post on Instagram

Let’s make no mistake this has always been about oil.

[Jitendra Hydonus]

World leaders reacted to the capture of Venezuelan President Nicolas Maduro by the United States with a mixture of outrage, concern, and caution on Saturday.

President Donald Trump announced the capture of Maduro and his wife, Cilia Flores, and a “large-scale” strike against Venezuela hours after explosions were reported in the country’s capital, Caracas.

The extraordinary attack follows months of pressure from the Trump Administration on Maduro to cede power in the South American country over long-standing accusations of drug trafficking and election rigging.

Read more: Venezuela Isn’t Panama—No Matter How Much Trump Wishes It Were

It represents the largest U.S. military operation in Latin America since the 1989 invasion of Panama, when, as today, the U.S. captured the country's leader, Manuel Antonio Noriega.

Many countries expressed outrage over the capture of Maduro on Saturday, while even some U.S. allies issued statements calling for the rule of law to be respected.

South American leaders in particular expressed anger at the attack.

Here is a round-up of global reaction to the operation.

United Kingdom

British Prime Minister Keir Starmer said he wanted to speak to President Trump before making any firm statements either way about Maduro’s capture.

"I always say and believe we should uphold international law, but I think at this stage [in a] fast moving situation, let's establish the facts and take it from there,” he said in a statement to British broadcasters.

"I want to establish the facts first. I want to speak to President Trump,” he said. "I want to speak to allies. As I say I can be absolutely clear we were not involved in that."

Russia

Russia's Foreign Ministry said it is "extremely alarmed" and called for "immediate clarification", according to a statement posted on Saturday on the ministry's Telegram channel.

It added later in a post on X: “The US committed an act of armed aggression against Venezuela, which gives rise to deep concern & warrants condemnation.”

“The pretexts used to justify these actions are untenable. Russia reaffirms its solidarity with the Venezuelan people,’ it continued in the post.

China

China's Foreign Ministry said in a statement that it was "deeply shocked" by what it described as a "blatant use of force against a sovereign state and action against its president."

"Such hegemonic acts of the U.S. seriously violate international law and Venezuela's sovereignty and threaten peace and security in Latin America and the Caribbean region," it said.

"China firmly opposes it. We call on the U.S. to abide by international law and the purposes and principles of the UN Charter, and stop violating other countries’ sovereignty and security," the statement continued.

United Nations

The United Nations said it was "deeply alarmed" by the U.S. strikes and capture of Maduro, suggesting it could have violated international law.

"These developments constitute a dangerous precedent," Stéphane Dujarric, spokesman for the U.N. secretary-general, said in a statement.

"The Secretary-General is deeply alarmed by the recent escalation in Venezuela, culminating with today’s United States military action in the country, which has potential worrying implications for the region," she added.

"The Secretary-General continues to emphasize the importance of full respect—by all—of international law, including the U.N. Charter. He’s deeply concerned that the rules of international law have not been respected," the statement continued

European Union

EU foreign policy chief Kaja Kallas wrote on X that she had spoken to US Secretary of State Marco Rubio and the EU ambassador in Caracas.

"The EU has repeatedly stated that Mr Maduro lacks legitimacy and has defended a peaceful transition," she wrote. "Under all circumstances, the principles of international law and the UN Charter must be respected. We call for restraint."

Mexico

In a statement on X, Mexico's President, Claudia Sheinbaum, shared an excerpt from the United Nations Charter.

“The Members of the Organization, in their international relations, shall refrain from the threat or use of force against the territorial integrity or political independence of any State, or in any other manner inconsistent with the Purposes of the United Nations.”

Brazil

Brazilian President Luiz Inacio Lula da Silva condemned the capture of Maduro as crossing “an unacceptable line”.

“Attacking countries, in flagrant violation of international law, is the first step toward a world of violence, chaos, and instability, where the law of the strongest prevails over multilateralism,” Lula wrote on X.

“The international community, through the United Nations, needs to respond vigorously to this episode,” he added.

Colombia

Colombia’s President Gustavo Petro condemned the U.S. operation in several posts on X.

“The Government of Colombia rejects the aggression against the sovereignty of Venezuela and of Latin America,” he wrote.

“Internal conflicts between peoples are resolved by those same peoples in peace. That is the principle of the self-determination of peoples, which forms the foundation of the United Nations system,” Petro continued.

Denmark

Denmark, which has been on the receiving end of threats from the Trump Administration to take control of Greenland, issued a muted response to the operation.

"Dramatic development in Venezuela, which we are following closely. We need to get back on track toward de-escalation and dialogue. International law must be respected," Foreign Minister Lars Løkke Rasmussen wrote on X.

Spain

Spanish Prime Minister Pedro Sanchez called for "de-escalation and responsibility.”

“International Law and the principles of the United Nations Charter must be respected," Mr Sanchez wrote on X.

AOL news
https://www.aol.com/articles/world-reacting-u-capture-nicolas-160112948.html

[Jitendra Hydonus]

View this post on Instagram

[Jitendra Hydonus]

Imagine the authenticity of his intentions on this while at the same time wanting to shoot imprison and hang those he disagrees with here in the states.

President Donald Trump issued a warning on social media Friday, writing that if Iran “violently kills peaceful protesters, which is their custom, the United States of America will come to their rescue. We are locked and loaded and ready to go.” The White House did not respond to a request for comment on what kind of aid Trump was referring to.

There seems to be an overwhelming interest in oil countries lately.

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/world/iran-protests-sparked-by-failing-economy-turn-deadly/ar-AA1TrEUY?ocid=edgemobile

🚨 Furious Military General Blasts Trump, Accuses Him of Betraying the Nation
This situation points to a serious civil–military crisis in the United States. While viral videos showing generals calling Trump a “traitor” are fictional and dramatized, the fears behind them are real and well-documented.

Retired generals, defense experts, and former intelligence officials are warning that Trump is demanding personal loyalty over loyalty to the Constitution, which violates a core principle of American democracy.

In October 2025 at Quantico, Trump suggested using U.S. cities as military training grounds—remarks described by professionals as bizarre, incoherent, and dangerous. A June 2025 Small Wars Journal article warned that Trump’s purging of generals, sidelining military lawyers, and domestic troop use are pushing the country toward a constitutional crisis, even asking what loyalty is owed to a president who may not honor his oath.

More than 300 former intelligence and security officials have warned the U.S. is drifting toward competitive authoritarianism due to the politicization of the military and attacks on legal constraints. The viral dramatizations resonate because they reflect a genuine and unprecedented alarm within the military community about threats to constitutional governance
👉👉👉:  https://autulu.com/pfkx9a

[Jitendra Hydonus]

Trump’s ICE agents

https://youtube.com/shorts/uYj1yNekFUw?si=61Cw_MLp71TzfHgX

[Jitendra Hydonus]

The wanna be king has ripped us out of 66 international organizations;

Trump has just ripped the United States out of 66 international organizations — the most sweeping dismantling of global cooperation in generations.

In a breathtakingly bold rewrite of U.S. foreign policy, President Donald Trump signed a memorandum January 7 directing every agency in the federal government to begin the process of withdrawing the United States from 66 international bodies, including 31 tied to the United Nations and 35 non-UN organizations.

 The White House claims these institutions are “contrary to the interests of the United States” — a catch-all phrase that now apparently covers everything from climate action and gender equity to migration and human rights cooperation.
This isn’t some bureaucratic pruning. Within that list sits the UN Framework

Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) — the foundational treaty underpinning all major global climate agreements since 1992 and the architecture that gave us the Paris Agreement — which the U.S. now becomes the only country in the world to leave.

It also includes the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), the planet’s most authoritative scientific body on climate science, and UN Women, a key force for gender equality and women’s empowerment.

Secretary of State Marco Rubio, speaking for the administration, made the ideological stakes explicit: Washington will no longer spend money, legitimacy, or diplomatic capital on institutions that it believes conflict with U.S. “sovereignty, freedoms, and general prosperity,” branding these global bodies as “wasteful” and “contrary to national interests.”

Let that sink in: we’re not talking about a tweak to budget priorities or a temporary pause on engagement. This is a full-scale rupture with the post-World War II global framework built on cooperation — on the understanding that confronting climate change, migration, public health, and human rights transcends borders and cannot be solved in isolation.

Critics across the political and scientific spectrum are already calling this what it is — a catastrophic abdication of global leadership.

 Former Biden climate adviser Gina McCarthy called the climate withdrawal “shortsighted, embarrassing, and foolish.” Analysts point out that pulling out of the UNFCCC sidelines the U.S. entirely from global climate decision-making, ceding influence to rivals like China at precisely the moment the world needs leadership.

This isn’t just about losing influence; it’s about inviting disaster. It means the U.S. abandons platforms where life-saving collaboration happens — from pandemic preparedness to climate adaptation financing, from migration coordination to human rights monitoring.

As The Washington Post’s reporting on the policy shift made clear, the administration has already used similar logic to reject cooperation with the WHO and UNESCO before.

For those of us who believe in a world where cooperation actually matters, this signals something far more profound than transactional diplomacy. It is a declaration that global problems — rising seas, forced displacement, extractive economies, gender-based violence — are now someone else’s problem. Trump isn’t reforming global governance; he’s dismantling it.

And make no mistake: the costs will be real. A fractured world means less ability to shape outcomes, fewer allies when crises hit home, and more power for authoritarian actors who do engage in global institutions — not to save the world, but to reshape it in their authoritarian image.

This is the clearest signal yet that the U.S. under this administration is not retreating into isolation by accident — it’s tearing down the architecture of shared global problem-solving by design. The question now isn’t whether we should care — it’s whether the rest of the world can survive the vacuum America is intentionally creating.

~Facebook

[Jitendra Hydonus]

https://youtu.be/q1vPAsM0seg?si=iBzWRFmGRESFe7bI

[Jitendra Hydonus]

Trump abandons JD Vance

https://youtu.be/RGOULv4EvWc?si=4eOS_-hTvBKQOokI

[Jitendra Hydonus]

View this post on Instagram

[Jitendra Hydonus]

Trump has gone as far in his desire to relitigate the 2020 election as to have the FBI seize ballots from Fulton County, Georgia, where he lost in 2020. That election’s ballots were counted three separate times and the results were affirmed each time.

Yahoo news

[Jitendra Hydonus]

Using chaos and distractions to make us forget the corruptiom and the insanity of Trumpster


https://www.facebook.com/share/v/1Ak65nwxJw/