A moment of awakening to Donald Trump

[Jitendra Hydonus]

Trump responded: “We are the federal law.” ‘He believes he is the law’: anti-Maga conservatives view Trump as threat to constitution.

https://www.yahoo.com/news/believes-law-anti-maga-conservatives-120010000.html

[mccoy]

It is well known by now that the POTUs sometimes speaks following his whims or other crazy ideas he has in his mind. Some other times, I think, he likes to throw disconcert in the minds of his opponents, with the purpose of surprising them.

In the above instance, the issue is related to transgender athletes in female sports. It is well known that this practice has ruined female sports in America and in the world. Biological females cannot compete with biological males who then decide to change sex. In all fairness, this is a fruit of the wokist dystopian times, as in the past supported by the democrat elite and unfortunately still lingering in what Yogananda extolled as the greatest country in the world.

In the above context, the POTUS' answer appears substantially coherent. His executive acts, whose purpose is to eradicate the degeneration that was taking America into a fast decline and ruin, must have the same power as federal laws, lest the degeneration keeps going.

Again, so far I have seen a POTUS who has been extremely coherent with his electoral promises and this time has been able to create an almost invincible team. Hopefully, he will keep with this strategy and will be able to mantain equanimity and fairness in his decisions, if he's able to be impervious to the ever-present dangerous suggestions of Satan.

The previous rulers clearly adhered to the suggestions of Satan, implementing a network of lies and deception to suppress freedom of speech and thinking.

[Jitendra Hydonus]

It is well known by now that the POTUs sometimes speaks following his whims or other crazy ideas he has in his mind. Some other times, I think, he likes to throw disconcert in the minds of his opponents, with the purpose of surprising them.

In the above instance, the issue is related to transgender athletes in female sports. It is well known that this practice has ruined female sports in America and in the world. Biological females cannot compete with biological males who then decide to change sex. In all fairness, this is a fruit of the wokist dystopian times, as in the past supported by the democrat elite and unfortunately still lingering in what Yogananda extolled as the greatest country in the world.

In the above context, the POTUS' answer appears substantially coherent. His executive acts, whose purpose is to eradicate the degeneration that was taking America into a fast decline and ruin, must have the same power as federal laws, lest the degeneration keeps going.

Again, so far I have seen a POTUS who has been extremely coherent with his electoral promises and this time has been able to create an almost invincible team. Hopefully, he will keep with this strategy and will be able to mantain equanimity and fairness in his decisions, if he's able to be impervious to the ever-present dangerous suggestions of Satan.

The previous rulers clearly adhered to the suggestions of Satan, implementing a network of lies and deception to suppress freedom of speech and thinking.

I guess no sense makes sense or is it all nonsense? One would wonder! Especially as mental illnesses reveal their latent tendencies in speech and actions.

All these manipulative strategies you speak of are products of the mind’s mechanisms and only display a preponderance of ego and mental ego functioning that blocks out the expression of the heart 💜 chakra. What it reveals is a personal magnetism that attracts only recognition of inflated ego needs and a self centeredness that is repulsive.

[mccoy]

Your retort is relevant if we wish to discuss about an answer from the POTUS.

But, if we speak about transgender athletes, which prompted the answer, that's undoubtedly a ruinous practice for female sports, if we at all mind about female sports or male sports. I don't mind sports very much, too often it's just money and business, but let's hypothesize that even in such a monetized environment, we would wish for some fairness.

Well, there is no fairness for ladies if such ladies have to compete with men.

Hence, the answer: 'we are the federal law' may be meant as a pragmatistic retort to some agency that believes that women competing in sports must be penalized in favour of men competing as women in sports.

Bottom line, if we want to be fair, there should be a transgender + intersex category in sports. There is not. Why? Then the federal law intervenes to stop such nonsense.

[Jitendra Hydonus]

Obviously I do not have all the answers but I will say this I personally had a friend that grew breasts like a woman and literally had to decide which way to go sexually speaking. Yes it was his/her decision. It is not as cut and dry as you make it out to be mccoy. Try as you may to make these issues into black and white colors. Which is a typical approach white supremacists continue doing on all issues.

[mccoy]

Obviously I do not have all the answers but I will say this I personally had a friend that grew breasts like a woman and literally had to decide which way to go sexually speaking. Yes it was his/her decision. It is not as cut and dry as you make it out to be mccoy. Try as you may to make these issues into black and white colors. Which is a typical approach white supremacists continue doing on all issues.

Steve, it is not the first time that you cite your androgynous (intersex) friend, and as I recall we have already discussed, if briefly, about it.

There has been an issue in the last Olympics with a female Algerian boxer fighting against an Italian female boxer. The Algerian had strong male facial traits, tall and larger than average arm muscles. The Italian boxer, after having hitten by the first blows, got scared and quit.

The world federation had already expelled the Algerian because of very high testosterone levels. But she published all her photos when very young, dressed as a girl. They interviewed her father, she confirmed she was raised always as a girl.

Bottom line, there are people who have 3 chromosomes. There are 16 combinations of these but many entail a supplementary Y on top of a typical female XX pair.

This may entail a medical condition, or may not. Any case is individualized. They are not typical biological women. They have a male chromosome.

To return to the OT, there are rules in some federations that prohibit participation (in female sports) to athletes with male or androgynous characteristics like high testosterone. But the woke philosophy wanted at all costs to implement a policy of inclusiveness. So these androgynous and transgenders all are accepted into female contexts in the Olympics, whose committee adheres to this woke inclusiveness at all costs policy.

Is the above fair to the few androgynous and transgenders? Maybe so. Is that fair to the vast majority of biological females? not at all.

So, for the sake of a small minority, the majority is sacrificed. Is this democracy? No, it's oligarchy. The ruling of the few.

What would a spiritual society do? Perhaps create a new sports federation of intersex+transgender individuals. Why such a simple thing has not been done? Because it does not adhere to the woke philosophy.

[Jitendra Hydonus]

mccoy I find that your last entry proves nothing accept that you support categorizing people into certain gender bins based on biological chromosomes. Just because a woman isn’t typical; should she be slandered and prejudiced against? I find myself being somewhat androgynous and feel quite comfortable with it. Many artists are. They blend and harmonize the female and male characteristics as Paramahansa Yogananda did and spoke of doing in the SRF lessons. In fact many times I’ve been asked ‘who is that woman you have pictured on the wall and Ofcourse I tell friends and acquaintances it is Paramahansa Yogananda my guru. He said that we are males and females in various lives to balance out the feminine and masculine characteristics of our soul. In many ways in my life I’ve favored a more masculine woman should I be told I need to be more masculine?

Since no so called masculine sports interest me and never have as far as I’m concerned all of them can be thrown out and people can start dancing and practicing yoga more. Boxing is an extremely aggressive sport and not my idea of anything masculine. I would never watch or even be interested in any boxing matches. For an aggressive sport I gravitate more toward karate, kung fu and ti chi. You start getting involved in western sports and you fall in the trap of attempting to force gender issues on people. Why get me involved in your political agendas which I consider sexist?

I do,on the other hand, find it interesting that being around women of various types as friends does interest me how they bring out the masculine and feminine traits in myself. But i find that is true of men as well. I’ve also looked at how the masculine element of competing and subduing other people has been a cultural trait of western life ever since we exterminated most of the indigenous race here in the states. The United States has a horrible history of exploiting other cultures, and Donald Trump is a living embodiment of that subjugation of other cultures and women.

[mccoy]

Why get me involved in your political agendas which I consider sexist?

Steve, I wasn't being aware that I was trying to involve you with my political agenda.

Actually, I adhere to one agenda, the cosmic agenda, the agenda set forth by the cosmic ruler himself, God, and his legion of angelic spirits.

God's agenda entails that we are usually born with one distinct, biological sex, determined at the moment of our conception by the actions accumulated by innumerable past incarnations.

If this means that God is sexist, then he, or she, or it, is sexist, no question. Human definitions have no relevance, we are dealing with concepts here, the cosmic sphere of thoughts which constitute the blueprint of creation.

The adverb 'usually' means that, for some obscure karmic reasons, sometimes people are born biologically with both qualities. I'll exclude this case since it is a very narrow minority, worth of very specific considerations.

So, if we have been assigned a male role in the cosmic movie, by this 'sexist' cosmic director, why should we rebel against the cosmic assignment? This is a breach of contract, a breach of the rules of karma, which can bring about dire consequences, probably a loop of incarnations where we continuously go against the karmic imposition of a specific sex, until we realize that we must be happy with what God assigned to us.

The above considerations are generic and may entail several exceptions, but that is what the great masters thought to us and what elementary wisdom suggests.

Of course, being born with a specific biological sex does not mean that we cannot and should not embrace the qualities of the opposite sex, if we see it fit that they are useful in the service of God and the others. This does not mean that we should have our virile members organs mutilated and mimicked a biological female, by no means.

God is sexist, that we like it or not. It is to our judgment to decide to what degree to express this sexist configuration. Judgment is often obfuscated by whims and presently the woke philosophy, which is the real political agenda, endorses and supported such philosophy.

At the end, it seems that Mr. Trump, revoking the woke policy in America, is presently endorsing, consciously or unconsciously, god's sexism. That's a matter of fact, whether we like it or not.

[Jitendra Hydonus]

With your philosophy…we are also born with one heart, two eyes two arms and so forth but thank God human beings do not adhere to that standard with the exactness you are a proponent of. In fact they replace parts of bodies that are no longer functioning… even hearts!

God is not sexist or set on the fact that for instance some people are born with a missing eye or hand …. It is you that feel they should stay the same …not God! You’ve made it into a political agenda calling it a ‘woke’ view. I simply said that what right has anyone to force their views on what they do with their bodies. Well Donald Trump sure feels he does!

As a matter of fact Jesus even changed the blind from birth to see. How lovely that he practiced what you demean as the ‘woke’ view!

[mccoy]

Steve, now I can't say I am following your logic, may be I've not been sufficiently clear in the previous post.

To be more clear, I'll start the reasoning again, following your logic.

Organs are created by God, or better, by God's blueprint ideas.

Organs can degenerate out of sickness or be injured.

Changing organs with transplants or surgery to make a person function again is in God's plans.

So far, we agree that organs or body parts can be changed, or must be changed, without karmic consequences.

What is not in God's plan is to arbitrarily decide to change sexual organs, when they are healthy, with the organs of the opposite sex.

Karma assigned us one sex. Because we are meant to learn lessons within the context of that biological sex.

Why to go against the decree of karma? Those who do that will reap serious consequences.

Also, those who encourage or support sex change, be it physical, with various mutilations and prosthesis, or chemical with the administration of sex hormones, will reap very serious consequences.

Why do I cite the woke philosophy? Because the woke philosophy encourages people to change sex, infringing one of the basic laws of Karma, one of God's assignments of roles in this cosmic movie. A huge breach of contract. In the movie world, a breach of contract has serious financial consequences. In the cosmic drama, a breach of contract like this has serious karmic consequences.

We can forget about Trump and the democrats. The above ideas are part of God's vast spheres of thought. Whosoever contradicts those ideas, chooses the wrong sphere of thought and must pay the karmic consequences.

[Jitendra Hydonus]

Steve, now I can't say I am following your logic, may be I've not been sufficiently clear in the previous post.

To be more clear, I'll start the reasoning again, following your logic.

Organs are created by God, or better, by God's blueprint ideas.

What is not in God's plan is to arbitrarily decide to change sexual organs, when they are healthy, with the organs of the opposite sex.

Karma assigned us one sex. Because we are meant to learn lessons within the context of that biological sex.

Why to go against the decree of karma? Those who do that will reap serious consequences.

Also, those who encourage or support sex change, be it physical, with various mutilations and prosthesis, or chemical with the administration of sex hormones, will reap very serious consequences.

Why do I cite the woke philosophy? Because the woke philosophy encourages people to change sex, infringing one of the basic laws of Karma, one of God's assignments of roles in this cosmic movie. A huge breach of contract. In the movie world, a breach of contract has serious financial consequences. In the cosmic drama, a breach of contract like this has serious karmic consequences.

We can forget about Trump and the democrats. The above ideas are part of God's vast spheres of thought. Whosoever contradicts those ideas, chooses the wrong sphere of thought and must pay the karmic consequences.

Why do I cite the woke philosophy? Because the woke philosophy encourages people to change sex, infringing one of the basic laws of Karma, one of God's assignments of roles in this cosmic movie. A huge breach of contract. In the movie world, a breach of contract has serious financial consequences. In the cosmic drama, a breach of contract like this has serious karmic consequences.

It is simply amazing to me that with all your scientific knowledge you completely ignore biological facts. If God has assigned the role of a hermaphrodite to a person then it is a ‘huge breach of contract ‘ to change it using your line of reasoning. The Maga supremacy and sexist attitudes will incur a ‘karmic debt’ forcing others to assume one gender or another when it is clearly God’s plan to make acceptions to the rule when it is God’s plan! Please read below….from encyclopedia Britannica…


Ask the ChatbotGames & QuizzesHistory & SocietyScience & TechBiographiesAnimals & NatureGeography & TravelArts & CultureProConMoneyVideos


Science
Biology
Life Cycle, Processes & Properties
hermaphroditism

biology

Actions
Also known as: androgyny, monoecism
Written and fact-checked by
The Editors of Encyclopaedia Britannica
Last Updated: Jan 13, 2025 • Article History

Contents
Ask the Chatbot a Question
 Clonorchis sinensis; hermaphroditism

Clonorchis sinensis; hermaphroditism Clonorchis sinensis, the Chinese liver fluke, is a human liver fluke belonging to the class Trematoda. C. sinensis is an example of a hermaphroditic organism.
(more)
hermaphroditism, the condition of having both male and female reproductive organs. Hermaphroditic plants—most flowering plants, or angiosperms—are called monoecious, or bisexual. Hermaphroditic animals—mostly invertebrates such as worms, bryozoans (moss animals), trematodes (flukes), snails, slugs, and barnacles—are usually parasitic, slow-moving, or permanently attached to another animal or plant.


In humans, conditions that involve discrepancies between external genitalia and internal reproductive organs are described by the term intersex. Intersex conditions are sometimes also referred to as disorders of sexual development (DSDs). Such conditions are extremely rare in humans. In ovotesticular disorder (sometimes also called true hermaphroditism), an individual has both ovarian and testicular tissue. The ovarian and testicular tissue may be separate, or the two may be combined in what is called an ovotestis. Affected individuals have sex chromosomes showing male-female mosaicism (where one individual possesses both the male XY and female XX chromosome pairs). Most often, but not always, the chromosome complement is 46,XX, and in every such individual there also exists evidence of Y chromosomal material on one of the autosomes (any of the 22 pairs of chromosomes other than the sex chromosomes).


Key People:  Magnus Hirschfeld
Related Topics:  protandry protogyny dichogamy polygamy perfect flower
See all related content
Individuals with a 46,XX chromosome complement usually have ambiguous external genitalia with a sizable phallus and are therefore often reared as males. However, they develop breasts during puberty and menstruate and in only rare cases actually produce sperm. In 46,XX intersex (female pseudohermaphroditism), individuals have male external genitalia but the chromosomal constitution and reproductive organs of a female. In 46,XY (male pseudohermaphroditism), individuals have ambiguous or female external genitalia but the chromosomal constitution and reproductive organs of a male, though the testes may be malformed or absent.

 Progressive Insurance
Take A Shot At Saving
Show off your good driving skills with Snapshot and see if you could save.
SPONSORED BY PROGRESSIVE INSURANCE
LEARN MORE

Treatment of intersex in humans depends upon the age at which the diagnosis is made. Historically, if diagnosed at birth, the choice of sex was made (typically by parents) based on the condition of the external genitalia (i.e., which sex organs predominate), after which so-called intersex surgery was performed to remove the gonads of the opposite sex. The remaining genitalia were then reconstructed to resemble those of the chosen sex. The reconstruction of female genitalia was more readily performed than the reconstruction of male genitalia, so ambiguous individuals often were made to be female. However, intersex surgery has long-term consequences for affected individuals. Later in life, for example, the person may not be satisfied with the results of surgery and may not identify with the assigned gender. Thus, patient consent has become an increasingly important part of decisions about intersex surgery, such that surgery may be delayed until adolescence or adulthood, after patients have had sufficient time to consider their gender and are able to make informed decisions about treatment. In older individuals the accepted gender may be reinforced by the appropriate surgical procedures and by hormonal therapy.