Yet from Elon Musk to the Murdochs, a small number of billionaire owners have a powerful hold on so much of the information that reaches the public. And in this most critical contest, two of America’s largest newspapers, the LA Times and the Washington Post, have broken with tradition and chosen not to issue endorsements for president. Something those two publications have in common? They are both owned by billionaires who could face retaliation in a Trump presidency.~the Guardian
Objectively, it seems that the Guardian has it in reverse.
It is well known that the public platform Twitter used to silence all those who expressed thoughts contrary to the democrat narrative, in terms of vaccination, transgenderism, and everything. They silenced your friend Mr. Trump for expressing ideas. Very weird in America, where freedom used to rule supreme.
At this point Mr. Musk, even if losing money, bought the platform and liberated the expression of freedom from it.
So it is exactly the opposite of what the Guardian is attempting to affirm.
Many of the media, affiliated with the democrat elite, have been proposing a heavily distorted narrative of events.
Fortunately, many people have noticed that. Channels like CNN are not so much followed any longer, whereas independent media and podcasters are the new popular channels.
Podcasters like Joe Rogan, who previously supported Bernie Sanders, now are supporting Mr. Trump. Do we wonder why?
Because they realized that there is an ongoing strategy to suppress freedom of thought, the democrat elite has been behaving, more or less subtly, like a ruling tyranny.
