Message #48246

[mccoy]

Steve, if Trump is not innocent I wonder why he's not been convicted. A lot of noise on the internet, very much noise from mainstream media hostile to Trump, so much noise that it sounds like an overpumped amplifier to make a weak guitar so noisy that it will overwhelm everything else.

I may give the benefit of the doubt to some people since I didn't follow the facts. However, he's not been convicted for collusion with russia. The other convictions (accountancy irregularities), are so insignificant and irrelevant to be such a poor excuse of a support to the hostilities of the democrat elite.

There are a few voices like the durham investigation supporting the innocence of Mr. Trump.

Do not let's forget it, it used to be a strategy, a propaganda method very similar to those used by Stalin and the soviet era russians (well, sometimes modern russia as well).

even Tulsi GAbbard was accused of collusion with russia. But she's still there, better, she's the National Intelligence director now.

So, tgwo people accused of collusion with Russia are 1) the POTUS; 2) The director of all intelligence agencies.

So, the possible conclusions are two:

1) They are totally innocent.

2) They are guilty, but their opponents have been totally incapable to prove it and send them to jail.

IF 2 is true, well, you should blame Trump's enemies on their supreme incompetence and not Mr. Trump for his cunning.