My simple reply is that I can not speak for God. If you feel you can do that I leave it to you.
However, we have all the writings of the great masters, Yogananda, Sri Yukteswar and SRF. They do not discuss politics but they provide a coherent logical framework which we can try to apply to politics.
I repeat, anyone being a different individualized expression of God sees the world with different eyes. My eyes are sensitive to logic and, besides noticing absurd ideas, have an aversion for particular attitudes such as hunger for power, propaganda, willingness to enforce one's own vision of the world, believing that such vision is the only viable one and all other visions must be deleted.
The above traits I'm seeing in the Democrat elite presently represented by st. Kamala, sanctified by the holy deities of the Democrats Elite.
I also see the negative traits in Fuhrer Trump, but they are of a more basic, naive, material and impulsive nature, not the calculating, sinister schemes of the left.
Last but not least: your personal negative experience with the MAGA people. Nasty people unfortunately are present in all political groups. Such people should be avoided. Not confronted with logic. They do not understand logic and do not like to discuss. They exist unfortunately in all ideologies.
You have brought up some points here now so I can respond to each one individually. Yes nasty people are unfortunately in all groups. The irony of the far right though is that they promote the idea of law and order but in fact will use law and order to suppress any one that disagrees with them, violating the principles of honesty and kindness that our Masters promote. Yes I would agree that it is best to avoid such people but it is impossible to do so when they do not function ‘logically’ as you termed it, but instead disrupt the function of free elections in an attempt to regain power without the support of free elections that have already occurred and decided the outcome in voting.
You conveniently left out our param gurus when speaking about their reluctance to talk about politics. Both Jesus and Krishna had missions of massively changing the political landscape of their time because of the political forces that were emerging at that time. In the Bhagavad Gita. Krishna instigated a movement to put Arjuna back in his rightful place as King. Stopping the overthrow of government that occurred as an outcome of misguided power struggles. That is essentially my point in the latest election where Trump attempted to usurp power and take it in his own hands. Not only using legal means but supporting an armed militia insurrection. And although Paramahansa Yogananda did not directly get involved in politics he certainly aligned himself with people who did like Mahatma Gandhi. He also made comments about the political situation and processes through history that clearly indicated his views on various political issues. Jesus was Ofcourse a political threat to the Jewish hierarchy and the Roman Empire. If he had not been why would have it been so important to crucify him? So with those words I believe I have logically refuted your statement that our gurus were not political in their life events.
I see the hunger for power as personified in Fuhrer Trump in that he is willing to use any means available to wield power and perpetuate his interests in the name of ‘making America great again.’ Notice he is all about America at a time that their should be a dramatic shift in paradigmatic out look and not putting my countries interests above all other countries.
In fact there is no naiveness in his plans as well. They are well thought out and documented in his agenda project 2025. This ‘calculating sinister propaganda’ is the Mein Kampf of the far right. The Fuhrer in this case being the representative of this movement, not having the intelligence to be its architect. And like all despots in the past he facilitates between supporting its principles and not, depending on what facilitates his rise to solidifying his power. The only guiding philosophy for him being the opportunistic means of becoming a ‘King’ and destroying the foundations of democracy. Putting instead representatives (for instance in the Supreme Court) that give him immunity to prosecution in his implementation of any means necessary to achieve ‘monarchy’.
