Recently I’ve been attempting to understand other people’s sphere of thoughts. There is often resistance or sometimes tension with others because we do not sufficiently understand their spheres of thought. We must also recognize that it is often not possible to explain or necessary to explain our thinking and attitudes to others.
I agree that, from our side, it is not possible, or necessary or advisable to explain the spheres of thought we adopted.
On the other side, I think that sometimes we may try to understand which spheres of thought other people have chosen. Those spheres of thought already existed in the causal world, so, if not too far-fetched, we may be able to grasp what they mean and if they adopted a right or a wrong sphere. It is an issue of discrimination. For example, should I listen to an expert explaining nutritional stuff on youtube? Did he or she usually adopt the right or the wrong sphere of thought? if we are able to discern if the expert is able to choose the right spheres, with a high degree of probability, then we can follow his or her suggestions. If they contrary, that's someone not to follow.
Also, in some instances we may recognize that is is useless and time consuming to discuss with someone who adopted a very wrong sphere of thought. For example, most conspiracy theories rose from the wrong spheres of thought in the realm of ideas. Spheres which are able to mesmerize the people who adopted them.
