Message #43704

[guest587]

Hey Steve, hope you get to listen to the chat between Mark Hyman and Marianne Williamson. She's well spoken, and it's a great interview.

There's a lot I agree with, and maintain my disagreement in regards to reparations. What makes me happy about 2024 and all the candidates coming to light, almost everyone agrees there's a problem with the system the way it is today: The alliance between monopolized interest, corporations and government. Greed, as underlined by Uwe in another post.

It really gives me a sense of confidence concerning Swami Vidyadhishanandas prediction, years ago, about a reformed capitalism taking place in America which will be made apparent as early as 2029 where younger, more compassionate leaders replace of the old. This realization will come full circle 2034. 11 years from now. We can expect one more major disaster created by the dying age, fighting to maintain its authority, sometime between 2025-2026. It might actually mean severely reduced population as a consequence. And much of what they wish to see come into fruition, will.

I'm not sure I agree with Marianne Williamsons stance on Emergency Powers. I look at the COVID scam and see how having emergency powers positioned big pharma, big tech, government and special interest in favorable positions at the cost of personal responsibility and well being of humanity. Real doctors and scientist were censored, real damages were created as a consequence of the forced participation of an experiment, where preventative medicines were censored and vilified and long term consequences are still swept under a rug today. The worlds response to covid cost people their jobs, created unspoken amounts of waste, and has cost people their lives.

I know, as well, that there are nefarious elements planted in the climate concern. The WEF and Black Rock have their own agenda and use the climate crisis to advance their wealth. So, it's a really delicate or tricky situation- because going green as laws are written and passed in the halls of congress, actually aren't bettering our environment but catering to special interest at the cost of our sovereignty. Slavery to something like a social credit score being a serious concern for humanities future. Look at the people who called for making life difficult for those who did not want to take an experimental injection, by denying them goods and services and turning them against their own families.

I think I would like to see Donald Trump, Marianne Williamson, Vivek Ramaswamy and Robert F Kennedy JR all at a debate stage. I think this awakening to the forces described above, has become more common place during Trumps presidency. It may be all these candidates have something to offer as well as something highly disagreeable. But I believe these are all promising candidates. It does give me a sense of hope for our future.

I would have liked to seen Tulsi Gabbard thrown into this equation but unfortunately, the special interest within her own party in alliance with Big Tech really bullied her out of the picture in her last presidential race.

I also maintain the belief that the 2020 election was not legitimate. There's a lot of corruption in our voting system and in our legal systems. So I fantasize this debate with a bit of dispassion. Still, listening to this interview was really pleasant... I was surprised to hear Mark Hyman advocate for Tucker Carlson, where he says Tucker is the only person that allowed him on the news to speak for an hour uninterrupted about the problem with food and healthcare system.

This coming together, despite having things we disagree about, is a part of the bigger picture necessary for humanities evolution into the Golden Age.