Julian Assange

[Jitendra Hydonus]

We see that Trumps appointees (Pompea) we’re trying to get Assauge and Biden has done nothing to help matters.

[Jitendra Hydonus]

Trump indicted Assuage. Biden does nothing, carrying on his views. Marianne calls out the lies of the government. Very sober evaluation of the Americans knowledge and concern.

[guest587]

Former U.S. Capitol Police Chief Steven Sund described January 6 as a “cover-up” in a leaked interview with Tucker Carlson that Fox News refused to air, the National Pulse revealed.

https://banned.video/watch?id=64d67ccc3a4bee58427e32c2

In never-before-seen footage that was withheld by Fox News, former Capitol Police Chief Steven Sund told former Fox News host Tucker Carlson that January 6th was a complete debacle and a “cover up.”

“Everything appears to be a cover up,” Sund tells Carlson in footage obtained by the National Pulse. “Like I said, I’m not a conspiracy theorist,” he continued. “…but when you look at the information and intelligence they had, the military had, it’s all watered down. I’m not getting intelligence, I’m denied any support from National Guard in advance. I’m denied National Guard while we’re under attack, for 71 minutes…“

https://www.infowars.com/posts/capitol-police-chief-challenged-j6-narrative-in-never-aired-tucker-carlson-interview/

It Was Pelosi: Former Capitol Police Chief Reveals 'Set Up' Behind January 6

Perhaps most damning is Sund's claim that then-House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-CA) refused to authorize the deployment of the National Guard at the Capitol despite Sund's pleas, and that federal agencies withheld information and warning signs of potential dangers prior to the riot.

"It doesn’t seem like people really want to get to the bottom of it," said Sund, adding "It really doesn’t. And it just gets worse. It gets worse from there."

https://www.zerohedge.com/political/it-was-pelosi-former-capitol-police-chief-reveals-set-behind-january-6

[guest587]

Just responding to this thread as a continuation of the words you used here,
"calling out the lies of the U.S."

"The problem is there are partisans littered throughout the legal system"

Senator Rand Paul told Fox News Thursday that in the case of Anthony Fauci “I don’t think there’s ever been a clearer case of perjury in the history of government testimony, and I don’t say that lightly.”

Paul explained that Fauci “said adamantly that the government never funded this [coronavirus] gain-of-function research.”

“We now have the Government Accountability Office, the GAO, has admitted that the funding came from the NIH,” Paul continued, adding “We have the acting director [Lawrence] Tabak, of the NIH, admitting it in writing that it came from the NIH.”

Paul further noted that “the smoking gun… is Fauci in private saying the opposite of what he was saying in public when he was publicly telling me that absolutely, we do not fund gain-of-function research in China.”

“He says privately we are suspicious that the virus has been manipulated and we are suspicious because we know they are doing gain-of-function research. He then goes on to describe the research, and it’s exactly the research that the NIH funded,” the Senator urged.

“The problem is there are partisans littered throughout the legal system, and people are seeing this. You don’t get prosecuted if you’re a Democrat under this administration, no matter what you do,” Paul warned.

https://www.infowars.com/posts/rand-paul-no-clearer-case-of-perjury-in-the-history-of-government-testimony-than-fauci/
Ain't that the truth?

[guest587]

Sen. Ron Johnson says COVID was intentionally released by an elite group of people who want to take control of peoples lives.
https://banned.video/watch?id=64d804e53a4bee5842dec5dd

The woman ask why couldn't people know there were alternatives to treat COVID? The truth is there were, and it was vilified. Propaganda efforts helped manipulate public opinion. Doctors and Pharmacists were threatened they'd lose their license if they prescribed Ivermectin. HCQ was also vilified. Dr. Zelenko was vilified even though he came up with the Zelenko protocol, a proven method used to treat COVID. Why??? Because the experimental clot shot injections would have never been approved if there were cheaper remedies made available.

[guest587]

The CIA is being sued over helping the Joe Biden campaign in 2020 unleash the so-called "Dirty 51" letter through which a list of former intelligence officials sought to interfere in the election by describing the Hunter Biden laptop scandal as Russian disinformation.

The fact is that authorities knew at the time the letter was released that the information from the laptop was accurate.

"The Deep State CIA, it seems, engaged in election interference and a political operation against the American people to help Joe Biden and hurt Trump,” said Judicial Watch President Tom Fitton. “And now the CIA is ignoring FOIA law to cover up its role in the scandal, censoring and suppressing the Hunter Biden/Joe Biden laptop story just before the presidential election."

https://www.wnd.com/2023/08/cia-sued-helping-biden-campaign-unleash-dirty-51-letter-interfere-election/

[guest587]

Former U.S. Capitol Police Chief Steven Sund described January 6 as a “cover-up” in a leaked interview with Tucker Carlson that Fox News refused to air, the National Pulse revealed.

https://banned.video/watch?id=64d67ccc3a4bee58427e32c2

In never-before-seen footage that was withheld by Fox News, former Capitol Police Chief Steven Sund told former Fox News host Tucker Carlson that January 6th was a complete debacle and a “cover up.”

“Everything appears to be a cover up,” Sund tells Carlson in footage obtained by the National Pulse. “Like I said, I’m not a conspiracy theorist,” he continued. “…but when you look at the information and intelligence they had, the military had, it’s all watered down. I’m not getting intelligence, I’m denied any support from National Guard in advance. I’m denied National Guard while we’re under attack, for 71 minutes…“

https://www.infowars.com/posts/capitol-police-chief-challenged-j6-narrative-in-never-aired-tucker-carlson-interview/

It Was Pelosi: Former Capitol Police Chief Reveals 'Set Up' Behind January 6

Perhaps most damning is Sund's claim that then-House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-CA) refused to authorize the deployment of the National Guard at the Capitol despite Sund's pleas, and that federal agencies withheld information and warning signs of potential dangers prior to the riot.

"It doesn’t seem like people really want to get to the bottom of it," said Sund, adding "It really doesn’t. And it just gets worse. It gets worse from there."

https://www.zerohedge.com/political/it-was-pelosi-former-capitol-police-chief-reveals-set-behind-january-6

"We at Revolver News are proud to have oriented the national discussion of January 6 to include a critical focus on the likely role of provocateurs and government actors in what is now appropriately termed the “Fedsurrection.” The smoking guns of this Fedsurrection remain the curious case of Ray Epps and the clear cover-up job and hoax associated with the so-called January 6 Pipe Bombs.

Apart from Ray Epps and the Pipe Bomb, however, we have reported on the actions of other key players in January 6th whose behavior warrants extreme suspicion. For instance, there is the bizarre case of an as of yet unindicted, unidentified man known to researchers as #Fencecutterbulwark."

https://revolver.news/2023/08/undercover-cop-caught-cutting-fences-new-jan-6-evidence-intensifies-suspicions-surrounding-key-fedsurrection-player/

[Jitendra Hydonus]

Eric;

I fail to see any correlation between your last five posts here and the topic of the thread, which is ‘Julian Assuage’. Your last 5 posts here were primarily about the insurrection of the United States government and looking at your posts on this thread I saw no mention of Julian Assuage, who was not involved in the insurrection of the United States government. In fact he was in prison at the time in another country.

Since these posts are all in an undesignated area for them and the information appears to be incorrect as well, I have created a new thread addressing the assertions you have provided above.

I appreciate your understanding on this matter. You are also welcome to respond at;

Dear Members,

I want you to check out "Correction of members points" on Spiritual Portal. To view it, please click this link:

http://spiritualportal.net/index.php?topic=8708.0

A comment has also been added regarding this topic:
Correction of a members points

Thanks,
Jitendra Hydonus

[guest587]

Just responding to this thread as a continuation of the words you used here,
"calling out the lies of the U.S."

This picture may share a similar predicament to that of Julian Assange and similarly the subjects discussed herein-



And of course,

[Jitendra Hydonus]

Just responding to this thread as a continuation of the words you used here,
"calling out the lies of the U.S."

This picture may share a similar predicament to that of Julian Assange and similarly the subjects discussed herein-



And of course,

Eric; Although I quite often agree with you, even on some political matters, there are times I also disagree. At these times of respectably disagreement, it does not help to say something was a quote of something you think I said without that quote in its entirety. As an example; I myself did not make any such quote that you provided above ( in this post ) with the word ‘quote’ as though I had said it. Please provide such statements.

I will say this though; both Daniel Elsberg and Mariam Williamson have provided a lot of evidence in the interview above that shows the government was involved with lies. But you put up ‘so called lies ‘ involved with the Jan 6 insurrection. Those lies were not the same as what Williamson and Ellsberg discussed above. In fact the lies you have brought into this thread are lies that the Trump supporters attempted to claim about the election results and the overthrow of our government. A different matter and topic to be separated from this one.

[guest587]

Hi Steve, I think you're confused on this quoting issue. I was quoting my own words from a few replies up. Separately. It's okay you disagree Brother. I clearly disagree with some of your views, but I do not feel the need to correct you or your beliefs. I do not feel the need to defend my own either. I will continue to share topics of interest, and provide plenty of content on this forum. Some content people will agree with, some content people will disagree with. It's that simple.

I haven't much to say, am feeling really good right now. If it pleases you to add something more, by all means:

[Jitendra Hydonus]

Hi Steve, I think you're confused on this quoting issue. I was quoting my own words from a few replies up. Separately. It's okay you disagree Brother. I clearly disagree with some of your views, but I do not feel the need to correct you or your beliefs. I do not feel the need to defend my own either. I will continue to share topics of interest, and provide plenty of content on this forum. Some content people will agree with, some content people will disagree with. It's that simple.

I haven't much to say, am feeling really good right now. If it pleases you to add something more, by all means:

Interesting take on events friend. And I’m feeling good also! Perhaps 🤔 you can explain this…..

Just responding to this thread as a continuation of the words you used here,
"calling out the lies of the U.S."

Notice you used the word ‘you’.

[guest587]

Yes... Because I was, "adding on" as a "continuation" to the title you've written in your second post-

'...calls out the lies of the US'

Here is the full title, "you" have written out-

Re: Julian Assauge; Marianne Williamson calls out the lies of the U.S.

I did not include the full title because I was adding separate but similar discussion... Do you get it? As in, those are the words that stood out to me- so I was responding to that, and in the end... Much of what I share is indeed relatable to the OT (original topic)- but if it is not... So what? Do our conversations always follow linearly your order of operations? No...

Sometimes people say something and conversations go in other directions. Though it is quite a skill to help redirect others back and show how it all relates. Julian Assange is calling out not just lies but criminal activity perpetuated by our own. Clinton is heavily involved with the Wikileaks scandal, and do you remember all that crap about her emails?

Do you also remember when they said Ivermectin was not good for treating COVID? Not only was that a lie, but our own institutions behavior was criminal. Where are the Julian Assange's of today?

There are people leaking information and blowing whistles that are vilified by our institutions and government. And the stories I have decided to share I find to be of a similar nature to the subject presented by you.

To me, this is not a matter of quoting you out of context. You are not being accused and I am adding additional content. Again... a continuation or- "piggybacking" off choice words.

....

[Jitendra Hydonus]

Yes... Because I was, "adding on" as a "continuation" to the title you've written in your second post-

'...calls out the lies of the US'

Here is the full title, "you" have written out-

Re: Julian Assauge; Marianne Williamson calls out the lies of the U.S.

I did not include the full title because I was adding separate but similar discussion... Do you get it? As in, those are the words that stood out to me- so I was responding to that, and in the end... Much of what I share is indeed relatable to the OT (original topic)- but if it is not... So what? Do our conversations always follow linearly your order of operations? No...

Sometimes people say something and conversations go in other directions. Though it is quite a skill to help redirect others back and show how it all relates. Julian Assange is calling out not just lies but criminal activity perpetuated by our own. Clinton is heavily involved with the Wikileaks scandal, and do you remember all that crap about her emails?

Do you also remember when they said Ivermectin was not good for treating COVID? Not only was that a lie, but our own institutions behavior was criminal. Where are the Julian Assange's of today?

There are people leaking information and blowing whistles that are vilified by our institutions and government. And the stories I have decided to share I find to be of a similar nature to the subject presented by you.

To me, this is not a matter of quoting you out of context. You are not being accused and I am adding additional content. Again... a continuation or- "piggybacking" off choice words.

....

I thought someone may be interested in Mariam Williamson and her calling out the government. That’s why I used the title above; Julian Assauge; Marianne Williamson calls out the lies of the U.S.

So you see it is not about me and my views. I’m exploring the candidates in this thread Eric. That is why your inserts were confusing to me. Let us find out who Mariam Williston is, I’ve already heard your views on other topics you’ve presented above. Thanks

[guest587]

Okay Steve 👌

And if I post something you've already heard, you can also choose not to respond.

I can't guarantee I won't address or re-address issues I find interesting.

Doing so is not an attack on your character either.