Yes... Because I was, "adding on" as a "continuation" to the title you've written in your second post-
'...calls out the lies of the US'
Here is the full title, "you" have written out-
Re: Julian Assauge; Marianne Williamson calls out the lies of the U.S. I did not include the full title because
I was adding separate but similar discussion... Do you get it? As in, those are the words that stood out to me- so I was responding to that, and in the end... Much of what I share is indeed relatable to the OT (original topic)- but if it is not... So what? Do our conversations always follow linearly your order of operations? No...
Sometimes people say something and conversations go in other directions. Though it is quite a skill to help redirect others back and show how it all relates. Julian Assange is calling out not just lies but criminal activity perpetuated by our own. Clinton is heavily involved with the Wikileaks scandal, and do you remember all that crap about her emails?
Do you also remember when they said Ivermectin was not good for treating COVID? Not only was that a lie, but our own institutions behavior was criminal. Where are the Julian Assange's of today?
There are people leaking information and blowing whistles that are vilified by our institutions and government. And the stories I have decided to share I find to be of a similar nature to the subject presented by you.
To me, this is not a matter of quoting you out of context. You are not being accused and I am adding additional content. Again... a continuation or- "piggybacking" off choice words.
....
I thought someone may be interested in Mariam Williamson and her calling out the government. That’s why I used the title above; Julian Assauge; Marianne Williamson calls out the lies of the U.S.
So you see it is not about me and my views. I’m exploring the candidates in this thread Eric. That is why your inserts were confusing to me. Let us find out who Mariam Williston is, I’ve already heard your views on other topics you’ve presented above. Thanks
