I also want to remind you, at no time did Sti Yukteswar clarify he was speaking of physical reality or did he specify the ages and dual were of a causal significance. You would think he meant in the physical realm but since he does not say we are left to understand the import of his words.
Of course it may be, I would propose to study the material expressly written after the theory of Sri Yukteswar:
https://binaryresearchinstitute.org/bri/As a rational and logical human being i ask you; To give this some thought. It takes over 230 million years to get around the Milky Way. So do you really think that in all thar time the Sun and our solar system has only one attraction; that is to the orbit of the center of the galaxy?Huh?
I intend on engaging in a study of the material as you have suggested. If this gets lengthy i will create a new thread (I'm not sure if you can as a moderator?).
By the fundamentals of the theory of gravity sun and solar system must be under the gravitational influence of all the objects in the galaxy. Fact is that the influence is directly proportional to the mass and inversely proportional to the square of the distance. In relativity, it is the space-time curvature that governs gravitational attraction. The result of the interaction among all objects in the galaxy is the final behavior of the motion of our solar system. Going back to your question, it's a complex matter, but presently there is no evidence of a gravitational pull with another star strong enough to creat a binary system.
Thanks mccoy.... From the Binary Institute; as you have proposed above.
The precession of the equinox
The precession of the equinox is observed as the stars moving across the sky at the rate of about 50 arc seconds per year, relative to the equinox.
Conventional theory holds that this phenomenon is due to the gravity of the sun and moon acting upon the oblate spheroid of the earth causing the axis to wobble (the lunisolar theory). The alternative explanation advanced by the Binary Research Institute is that most of the observable is due to solar system motion, causing a reorientation of the earth relative to the fixed stars as the solar system gradually curves through space (the binary theory or model). We find the binary model better explains acceleration of the precession rate, better predicts changes in the rate, answers a number of solar system problems and has none of the paradoxes or inconsistencies associated with lunisolar precession theory.2
The Research section includes a summary of our basic work investigating the mechanics of precession, describes some of the problems with current theory and gives data to show that solar system motion is a better explanation for the observable known as the precession of the equinox. If you move your mouse over the word “Research” you will find this work broken into five further sections entitled: Introduction, Evidence, Calculations, Finding It and Papers and Articles. We invite you to browse.
For a tutorial on our alternate view of precession please begin with the “Introduction” and keep clicking the “Next” button and it will carry you through each section of the presentation.
If you have any comments or questions about this website or any of our work please feel free to contact us.
From the introduction:
"While there is no obvious visible companion star to our Sun, there could be a dark binary, such as a brown dwarf or possibly a relatively small black hole, either of which might be very difficult to detect, without accurate and lengthy analysis."
