Steve,
I was intrigued by your initial reply- then you started making points about Gab and Infowars and really lost me. Now I have to get ready for work. I will have to go back and give your initial reply the credit it deserves.
You'd be interested to know
it was through Gab that I learned this upcoming Tuesday the 17th US House subcommittee will hold a public hearing on UFO's or UAP.
It was
also through InfoWars that I discovered Dr. Steven Greer.
Perhaps it's best you let go trying to prove your point, it's kind of like beating a dead horse. It may have been important for you, and it will help you serve others. But to go further after knowing I've had the opposite experience from whatever point it is you're trying to prove is turning a bit into an unhealthy obsession. There may be a way to custom-tailor these points you insist on making, based on the feedback reality is giving you. In other words, your experiences are valid- and there is a time and a place. I believe it will be made clear when is the time to speak on those experiences, and when is the time to observe. Or maybe, it's simply better if I agree with you- but know full well that isn't necessarily the truth I am agreeing with? It is the truth... But it is also not the only way.
There's a lesson in this for the both of us. Can you be you without needing to attack the sources of information that have guided me to these discoveries? Can I be me without needing to correct your mindset which often cites sources of information that align with your personal experience?
And when I return, we can focus on the more important reply- your initial one. I feel the weight behind that one, as you've said before.
