Message #24745

[Jitendra Hydonus]

I think we can be grateful that somethings are not science. I am grateful that music is not a science yet it is obviously effective and probably will be around much longer then science and has been here way before it. So you see even though something may have varifiable data (as astrology does) does not make it wonderful. In many ways science gives things a dirty name. So I need not prove anything. Quite frankly being indoctrinated in science in college was one of the worst experiences I had. I have never met more stubbornly obstinate, dogmatic and ignorant people as I have scientists and fanatical Christians. Most of the ones I have met refuse to consider anything outside their circle of their clubs bias based on the way they choose to check or conduct all their examinations. Let us see....'We cannot accept anything that lies outside of the Bible'....Or; 'we cannot consider anything that is a psuedo science' or based on 'superstitious behaviors'. That's the kind of smugness and self indulgence I have witnessed.

It may be of interest to you that astrology classes are taught at universities and schools. One of my best friend's taught in that capacity. It may also be of more interest to you that the people who have tried to start programs on, for instance, parapsychological research have been stopped in universities by who would you think? Ah yes; our prejudicial scientists came to the rescue. They would not have 'psuedo science' at their universities...Even though the interest and backing has been strong.

If this had been a thread about science I may have given a more erudite response. Since it is not and many scientists like to apply their experiments on everything but themselves I will say this; the music I make is profoundly scientific and varifiable on all levels. Now would you like to listen....Ha ha!