Tulsi Gabbard

[Jitendra Hydonus]

What to know about Tulsi Gabbard

https://www.aol.com/know-tulsi-gabbard-trumps-pick-214234467.html

https://youtu.be/94QiykQrH2o?si=bZj1vJdGbENGLWe7

Chosen as director of national intelligence.

[mccoy]

Thanks for the news, I think that's a very good choice a very important one, I was just wondering about the fate of Tulsi Gabbard and given her military service overseas she has probably developed some competence in the field.

Above all, what I believe is fundamental will be her ability to listen her advisors, discriminate the reports, and decide what are the best options available. We'll see.

The following video started playing by itself, I just captured the words 'Karma-Yoga', I'm to listen to it later on.

[Jitendra Hydonus]

Mccoy I am of the opinion that Tulsi Gabbard always had something to offer the Democratic Party. I was not happy that many in the Democratic Party shunned her. I do not believe that taking a 180 degree turn was the answer but I do believe that as Trump is considering her as a top official in his presidency Harris would have also had Cheney in hers. In both incidents I believe that having people from opposite parties would and will be beneficial in helping new administrations having a clearer and more impartial view in decision making. I’m not sure how she means that Biden did not help our relationship with India because he did reach out to Modi in support of such things as support of India in its battle with Communist China. I also know that India has not been helpful to countries supporting Ukraine in its fight against Russian intervention and aggression.

Thanks for your inclusion of a helpful video to better understand Tulsi Gabbards views on leaving the Democratic Party. Like JFK junior I believe both these statesmen and women should have never been ostracized from the Democratic Party, which i have said before, just as I am strongly of the opinion that Mit Romney, Liz Cheney and Kinzinger should have never been ostracized from the Republican Party. In both scenarios it was a good way of making enemies out of friends. It is yet to be seen what retribution Trump intends to take on his enemies as he has promised during his candidacy. A threat which was not echoed by Harris and her allies.

——————————————————————————————————


Biden and Narendra Modi look to tighten US-India ties as concerns rise over China. The leaders have looked to tighten the U.S.-India partnership amid shared concerns over an increasingly assertive China, climate change, artificial intelligence and global supply chains.

https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/joe-biden/biden-modi-look-tighten-us-india-ties-concerns-rise-china-rcna104042

[mccoy]

It is yet to be seen what retribution Trump intends to take on his enemies as he has promised during his candidacy. A threat which was not echoed by Harris and her allies.

Steve, I may be wrong, but I don't think Mr. Trump will take any revenge other than firing people who were hostile to him. We are going to see, presently he seems focused on starting his program.

Also, as I see it the Democrat Elite did not need to allude to any revenge, since they tried to get revenge, in all ways from the start of Trump's first mandate. the tycoon was an outsider, not a career politician, who dared to challenge their political supremacy (and win).

No conspiracy intended, it is simply observation on how political things go. Something similar happened to an Italian premier years back.

In the end, judging from the premises, I wouldn't be so pessimistic about the future of this mandate. Some people, like Mrs. Gabbard, seem genuinely interested in serving the country.

[Jitendra Hydonus]

It is yet to be seen what retribution Trump intends to take on his enemies as he has promised during his candidacy. A threat which was not echoed by Harris and her allies.

Steve, I may be wrong, but I don't think Mr. Trump will take any revenge other than firing people who were hostile to him. We are going to see, presently he seems focused on starting his program.

Also, as I see it the Democrat Elite did not need to allude to any revenge, since they tried to get revenge, in all ways from the start of Trump's first mandate. the tycoon was an outsider, not a career politician, who dared to challenge their political supremacy (and win).

No conspiracy intended, it is simply observation on how political things go. Something similar happened to an Italian premier years back.

In the end, judging from the premises, I wouldn't be so pessimistic about the future of this mandate. Some people, like Mrs. Gabbard, seem genuinely interested in serving the country.

Yes I have always found her and JFK Jr. Likable and there views a good contrast to the Democratic Party’s diversity. There always comes a time in our lives when we have to integrate the views of those we may disagree with into our own views. Your views about challenging and winning do not echo my own. I see life as a continuum, from one life to another. And, people who have no integrity of their own and only self interest as a motivator as eventually falling by the wayside, just as Nero, Hitler and Stalin are examples. There is a higher law that requires restitution and I would not like to be answerable to such a law despite momentary illusions of material power and delinquent behavioral ethics that flourish in the public domain. Let others learn from their own mistakes, I have enough of my own to be concerned 😟 with without fixating on those of others and this country’s. I find it interesting to know more about other countries since this last election. Perhaps 🤔 my attachment to living in this country for more than one lifetime is in itself an identity issue I myself need to loosen.

[mccoy]

Steve, I wouldn't be too discouraged.

I'll give you a very simple outlook of how I see the situation presently.

With full power, comes full responsibility. Mr. Trump knows it well.

If he won't be able to carry out his promises, at least a good part of the main ones, he will have no excuses. He knows it well.

His ego will not allow him to stand failure. So he's going to do his best. Something good should come out of this mandate. Some of his plans are good for everyone, like global peace, domestic prosperity, lesser crime, lesser bureaucracy and so on.

This is maybe the last challenge Mr. Trump will have in his life. Hopefully, he won't botch it. But everything is possible.

[mccoy]

I find it interesting to know more about other countries since this last election. Perhaps 🤔 my attachment to living in this country for more than one lifetime is in itself an identity issue I myself need to loosen.

Italian politics lives often in the wake of American politics. Ms. Meloni, the premier, is a friend of Mr. Musk. The ideology of the local lefties is similar or identical to the ideology of the American lefties. Ideology is becoming global as well. And whatever America does, the repercussions are felt around all the world.

[Jitendra Hydonus]

mccoy I’m not sure if you sense this or not. Quite frankly I do not see Donald Trump as a man with moral convictions. He has always been a person with no moral scruples. An opportunist at the very least and a person with no conscience or remorse at worst. How can that type of vibration lead to a promising outcome? Character is the guiding principle in decision making. For a people that no longer find good character important in the guidance of their actions the compass of their life leads them astray. As spiritual beings we are no longer progressing when we put luxury, extravagance, self aggrandizing and immediate pleasure principles above everything. And we have lost the sense of compassion and human empathy for others, seeking retribution for acts committed. These are certainly not the qualities that Jesus Christ emulated as an example for living.

This is what Paramahansa Yogananda meant when he talked about a country which has misplaced priorities. My personal karma is intertwined with such qualities. I am beginning to understand these complexities and personal karmic dynamics.

Steve, I wouldn't be too discouraged.

I'll give you a very simple outlook of how I see the situation presently.

With full power, comes full responsibility. Mr. Trump knows it well.

If he won't be able to carry out his promises, at least a good part of the main ones, he will have no excuses. He knows it well.

His ego will not allow him to stand failure. So he's going to do his best. Something good should come out of this mandate. Some of his plans are good for everyone, like global peace, domestic prosperity, lesser crime, lesser bureaucracy and so on.

This is maybe the last challenge Mr. Trump will have in his life. Hopefully, he won't botch it. But everything is possible.

[Jitendra Hydonus]

And this is Mrs. Gabbard on the Democrats.

Tulsi Gabbard: They are actively pushing …
(01:24:03) … question up for debate for them. They are actively pushing for boys who identify as girls to compete against girls in sports, changing our language so that the word woman, the identity of being a woman is essentially being erased from our society and it is the height of hypocrisy and, frankly, an act of hatred towards women that they are so intent on doing this, and ironic that it’s coming from the party that for so long proclaimed themselves to be the greatest feminists and the most pro-woman party in the country.

[/quote]

Weird. Miss Gabbard

I’ve been voting for truth. Not Democrat or Republican. But Dishonest Don represents a constant stream of lies. His crimes are too long to list here again. But as much as I appreciate you Miss Gabbard and listen to you on this issue of truth. I have consistently shown that Donald Trump is a man of perpetual lies. So where do we start? The only detail given here is transgender ‘pushing’ but I see no evidence of this. People should be able to decide for themselves on such personal matters without the push of your views on others. And that is exactly what I see you have done. I suppose the next thing would be that men are not allowed to take care of their children while women work. This is only the beginning of forcing gender roles on people that I see you are supporting. It is all a part of the far right - which you have joined with Donald Trump. I believe the whole gender role subject is way out of balance and that we should think of ourselves as human beings or more importantly as souls.

[mccoy]

Today I listened to a podcast dated 7 months ago. Tulsi gAbbard. She explains why she left the democrat party after having been boycotted as a presidential candidate and after subsequently having endorsed Bernie Sanders.

Her accusations toward the Dems are pretty significant. Suppression of freedom of speech, irrational thinking by wokism, warmongering, and so on. The turnabout of Joe Biden after his election.

I found them, on the whole, pretty convincing. She provides many interesting details. As she explains in the interview, she's a real karma-yogi.

There is also a very useful table of transcripts.

https://lexfridman.com/tulsi-gabbard-transcript

[mccoy]

Mrs. Gabbard speaking of Mr. Biden:

....
(01:30:58) But the truth that I know exists, which points to his weakness, is that instead of listening to his better angels, he has instead at every turn… If you go back and I look back to his inauguration speech where he promised to be a president for all Americans, and during his campaign, promised to be the uniter in chief, to bring a country together that was deeply divided. That’s the Joe Biden that I’ve known for many years.
(01:31:34) A guy who has worked with different people with different backgrounds and different political views but tried to find at different points in time a way to work together. At every turn, he has done the exact opposite of what he spoke about during his inauguration speech and has left us as the American people today more divided, less secure, both from an economic standpoint as well as a national security or safety and security standpoint, and less free as a society and as a people....

And Mrs. Gabbard speaking of Professor Obama:

...
(01:33:59) And they’ve expressed to me personally how heartbroken they were because so quickly after he was elected, instead of bringing in a new generation of fresh leadership that was not a part of the Washington establishment, he instead immediately chose to surround himself with people who were more of the same old, same old. Who were essentially part of the problem. And many of his actions after that proved that fear and that brokenheartedness that they felt to be true. I’ll mention one example related to civil liberties that we talked about.
(01:34:45) He was someone as a US senator who gave some pretty powerful speeches on the Senate floor about his concerns with the Patriot Act, his concerns with surveillance from the NSA, his concerns with a violation of our Fourth Amendment Rights and civil liberties. But when, as president, he was confronted with leaked information about this surveillance occurring under those authorities in his presidency, he sided… he took the side of the national security state and did not take action to right the wrongs that he correctly pointed out as senator and during his campaign for the presidency, which is unfortunate because he really did build this unifying momentum throughout his campaign.

[mccoy]

And this is Mrs. Gabbard on the Democrats.

Lex Fridman
(01:22:02) Like I said, you were a long-time Democrat. You ran for president in 2020 as a Democrat. Now, you’re an independent, and you wrote an excellent book, describing your journey ideologically, philosophically through that. Why did you choose to leave the Democratic party?
Tulsi Gabbard
(01:22:25) In the book, I go into a number of the central reasons why I made that choice, but fundamental to them is that the Democratic party has become a party that is opposed to freedom, that is opposed to the central and foundational principles that exist within our founding documents, and that serve as the identity of who we are as Americans and what this country is supposed to be about. It has become a party that is controlled by this elitist cabal of warmongers, who are driving forward this “Woke agenda,” and we see it through their racializing of everything. We see this through their defund the police mission. We see this through their open border policies. We see this through how, in their education policy, they’re failing our kids, and how they are pushing this narrative, that ultimately is a rejection of objective truth.
(01:23:52) The fact that it’s a question up for debate about whether or not … Well, actually, it’s not a question up for debate for them. They are actively pushing …
Tulsi Gabbard
(01:24:03) … question up for debate for them. They are actively pushing for boys who identify as girls to compete against girls in sports, changing our language so that the word woman, the identity of being a woman is essentially being erased from our society and it is the height of hypocrisy and, frankly, an act of hatred towards women that they are so intent on doing this, and ironic that it’s coming from the party that for so long proclaimed themselves to be the greatest feminists and the most pro-woman party in the country.

[mccoy]

I’ve been voting for truth. Not Democrat or Republican. But Dishonest Don represents a constant stream of lies. His crimes are too long to list here again. But as much as I appreciate you Miss Gabbard and listen to you on this issue of truth. I have consistently shown that Donald Trump is a man of perpetual lies. So where do we start?

If you are voting for truth, then perhaps you shouldn't have been voting at all. If a little of what Mrs. Gabbard says is true, then Obama was a big hypocrite and lied, and Biden was even a bigger liar. So there is no truth on the side of politicians.

Your reasoning would be more logical if you said 'I chose to vote for those who lie less'. Even though then we should find an objective method to score lies.

Also, you insist on the too-long list of Mr. Trump's crimes. However, the only evidence of crimes was irregular checks, invoices, and refunds. Excuse me but I don't find that very impressing as a list of crimes. Especially so for a man who has been called Hitler. And those crimes are only in the first degree of judgment, that is, they are pending an appeal.

The truth appears not to be Mr. Trump's alleged long list of crimes, but rather the power-hungry lefts who never forgave the outsider Mr. Trump to have been able to take power, and put in motion a huge mud-slinging machine.

The truth to me is evident: a clash of greediness.

[mccoy]

So where do we start? The only detail given here is transgender ‘pushing’ but I see no evidence of this

Actually, there are more details and I posted them previously. Dishonesty of Obama and Biden, warmongering, overt defamation of political adversaries.

As to the transgender pushing, yes, I have evidence from various interviews on the internet, that there is an active pushing to encourage tendencies to change sex, for convicts, young boys and so on. On young boys it can be desruptive. This is a very disturbing aspect of apolitical current, and aspect which I will never accept, and aspect stemming from some ideological derangement of logic.

[Jitendra Hydonus]

Thanks mccoy you have posted Tulsi Gabbards opinion. Do you have opinions of your own? Anyone can list long opinions others have, it takes more thought and contemplation to express your own on each detail of those of others. If you like her as much as I have let us hear your opinions on her views. She is not here at this time for me to respond to her. But you are. I attempt to give my views about others. Tulsi Gabbard has views that resemble my own. And she also has views that I do not agree with; I think she has an interesting perspective because she is willing to investigate and interview people who others consider our ‘enemies’ Franklin Roosevelt had to sit next to Joseph Stalin to settle WWll. Think of setting next to a man like Joseph Stalin or in the case of Tulsi Gabbard: President Bashar al-Assad. She also met with Daniel Elsberg and wants to have Julian Assauge recognized and pardoned.

Myself; I agree with her on her accomplishments and think Trump made a good decision hiring her (Mccoy; you always wonder if i can find anything about Trump that is good. Now you have something you wanted.) She also had the ability to criticize and question Trumps decision to act as a pimp ‘prostituting’ the military. I like her open confrontational style;

https://youtu.be/pmaKYl4fPkE?si=F0h9jjpyODh5zv6_

Thanks 🙏