Spiritual Portal

More and more we are finding the proof of how Sri Yukteswar was right about the higher periods of time before us and also after.

A 7000 year-old tablet found in Greece over a decade ago challenges traditional archaeology.

This artifact was discovered in a Neolithic lakeshore settlement that occupied an artificial island near the modern village of Dispilio on Lake Kastoria in the Kastoria Prefecture, Macedonia, by George Hourmouziadis, the Professor of Prehistoric Archaeology at the Aristotle University of Thessaloniki and his team in 1993.

People living in the settlement 7,000 to 8,000 years ago used to inhabit the area, and the Dispilio Tablet was one of the many artifacts found there. The tablet is significant because it bears an ancient, cryptic inscription that dates back to before 5,000 BC.
The existence of the Dispilio Tablet (also known as the Dispilio Scripture) conflicts with conventional archaeology’s belief that writing was not developed until 3,000 to 4,000 BC in Sumeria.

The Carbon-14 (radiocarbon dating) method dated this wooden tablet to 5,260 BC, making it significantly older than the writing system used by the Sumerians.

The text on the tablet includes a type of engraved writing that may consist of a pre-existed Linear B writing system used by the Mycenaean Greeks.
Mycenaean Greece (or the Mycenaean civilization) was the last phase of the Bronze Age in ancient Greece.

Professor Hourmouziadis has suggested that this kind of writing, which has not yet been decoded, may have been any kind of communication, including symbols representing the counting of possessions. According to Professor Hourmouziadis, the markings suggested that the current theory proposing that the ancient Greeks received their alphabet from the ancient civilizations of the Middle East (Babylonians, Sumerians and Phoenicians etc) fails to close the historic gap of some 4,000 years.

This blind gap translates into the following facts: while ancient eastern civilizations would use ideograms to express themselves, the ancient Greeks were using syllables in a similar manner like we use today.

A scripture inherited from descending Dwapara?

Yes the middle of the last descending Dwapara Yuga. 😊 It does have that kind of look. Certainly could be a challenge to the Bible people! All those who know there is only one religion. And that includes much of religion around the globe, so it seems, in religious war and intolerance. You have a fascinating thought here Lucca. Just think another religion....before all the others who thought there’s was the only one! That would shake up their nest a bit. But it does appear that only Sri Yukteswar appeared to understand the true significance of the procession of the equinoxes - which science has only a superficial knowledge of the physical knowledge of our Suns orbit around another celestial phenomena. But the social aspect of the spiritual ascension and decadence of humanity through a 24,000 year cycle seems to be the insight of Sri Yukteswar for this eon of time. This is a massive step for humanity and is the insight of a spiritual awakening and genius. A great awakening in anthropology, spiritual development, astronomy and astrological understanding.

Look at this one mccoy….

Imagine the majestic Gunung Padang pyramid in Indonesia, a sight that could easily make you feel as though you've stepped back in time. Carbon dating reveals that this incredible structure might be a staggering 28,000 years old! Just think about that for a moment—it pushes the boundaries of what we believe about early human societies. This ancient monument isn't just a relic of the past; it's a profound challenge to our understanding of human civilization and its capabilities long before recorded history.



[attachment deleted by admin]

Steve, I just hate to be the usual party-pooper, but that dating is controversial and has not been confirmed by credible sources.


The whole story is in the Wiki voice.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gunung_Padang

I may stand corrected but at the same time I see no evidence here of when these people that made a correction have assigned the time period. Often ‘credible sources’ do not produce any informative results for their conclusions so they themselves have little credibility. At least not that you have provided above . But they have given some dates in the link you provided, which as far as I can see are not substantiated, and may also show their personal bias about history and how it has unfolded.

Archaeologist Lutfi Yondri from the bureau of archaeology in Bandung has estimated that the structures at Gunung Padang may have been built sometime between the 2nd and 5th centuries CE, thus in the Indonesian late prehistoric period, whereas Harry Truman Simanjuntak has suggested a later date in historical times, between the 6th and 8th centuries CE.[9] Pottery fragments found at the site were dated by the bureau of archaeology in the range 45 BCE–22

Notice the above conclusions were taken from pottery fragments, which does not indicate how old the building is. Any body could have come and used the archeological remains for their usage far after it was built.

It sounds like I may stand corrected on this one. Since the estimate I provided has been retracted. Although the assessments that these men gave - which are much later - show no evidence here of how they came to their conclusions. Perhaps there will be more conclusive forthcoming evidence available.

Thanks 😊 let us continue to unravel the mysteries that have been found from periods way before what was thought to be true. As there are also many of those available, and this one may still be such an example. I do not see you as a party pooper mccoy but rather as  a truth seeker and attempting to find the right attitude in our evaluation of ourselves. Many times we are under the illusion of false assumptions that need correcting on our spiritual journeys. I certainly am not immune to such false and at times naive predilections.

[attachment deleted by admin]

steve, what caught my attention was the reference to carbon-dating. That's a scientific method which constitutes evidence.

Unfortunately, the dating should be carried out on material related to the building of the artifact of which we desire to know the date of origin.

I'm no archeologist, but what I think I read in the wiki concise explanation is that someone made a mistake but that mistake was supported by the President of Indonesia, for reasons of historical pride. The article was published, but then evidently it raised so much criticism that was retracted.

I've been pretty disappointed as well.

Well so far I do not see any carbon dating or support for the other more conventional archeological research either.

I'm not an archeologist but as a geologist I can tell you that's the only (or one of the few) objective way to date a sediment when there are no other references. I think it's pretty much used in archeology, again when other references are missing.